Re: local GPO question
From: Darren Mar-Elia (dmanonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: larrydalooza: "Re: Automating Printer Installation"
- Previous message: Inoue210: "User internet access"
- In reply to: Mark Renoden [MSFT]: "Re: local GPO question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:00:35 -0700
Thanks Mark. Strange, but I think it makes sense.
-- Darren Mar-Elia MS-MVP-Windows Management http://www.gpoguy.com "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <markreno@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:%23tTXJpQeEHA.596@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Hi Darren > > I think it's slightly more subtle: > > 1. Windows 2000 always waited for the network. You just had the option of > synchronous or asynchronous policy processing. > > 2. Windows XP lets you wait for the network or not. If you don't wait, > you're using asynchronous processing. If you do wait, you're using > synchronous processing. > > I guess the policy processing aspect result is the same but there is a > subtle difference here that may make some difference some of the time. > > Cheers > -- > Mark Renoden [MSFT] > Windows Platform Support Team > Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com > > Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email > me; I'll post a response back to the group. > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > "Darren Mar-Elia" <dmanonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:erIWyzPeEHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > Thanks Mark. I had understood that turning off Fast logon optimization in > > XP > > was equivalent to setting foreground synchronous processing, but it sounds > > like what you're saying is that is not the case--but rather that it is > > just > > waiting for the network stack to start up? Its a bit confusing because in > > KB > > 305293 it says at the end, > > ********************************** > > "Note that Windows XP clients support Fast Logon Optimization in any > > domain > > environment. To turn off Fast Logon Optimization, you can use the > > following > > policy setting: > > Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\System\Logon\ Always wait > > for the network at computer startup and logon > > > > When this policy is enabled, a Windows XP client behaves in the same > > manner > > as a Windows 2000 client at both system startup and at user logon" > > ************************************* > > > > But is this saying that GP processing for both machine startup and user > > logon are done synchronously when fast logon is disabled, or just that > > both > > events wait for the network stack to start first? (actually I guess it's > > machine startup that needs to wait for the stack, since once its started, > > the user logon shouldn't care) > > > > Thanks! > > -- > > Darren Mar-Elia > > MS-MVP-Windows Management > > http://www.gpoguy.com > > > > > > > > "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <markreno@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:eQe2jROeEHA.2544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > >> Hi > >> > >> My understanding was that this policy setting is specific to Windows XP > > and > >> Windows Server 2003. By default, these operating systems don't wait for > > the > >> network stack to become active before presenting the user with the logon > >> dialog. This allows for a faster logon. The thing here is that user > >> (and > >> computer) policy can't process until the network stack comes up and a DC > > is > >> contacted. By enabling the setting we've been discussing, the OS waits > > for > >> the network stack before presenting the logon dialog. This ensures that > >> policy is processed at logon. > >> > >> This is slightly different to the Windows 2000 version that Darren is > >> talking about. In Windows 2000, the OS always waited for the network but > >> the settings mentioned by Darren determined whether the policy was > > processed > >> before the logon dialog (for computer settings) and before the desktop > >> appeared (for user settings) or if policy processing could occur > >> simultaneously to these events. > >> > >> Kind regards > >> -- > >> Mark Renoden [MSFT] > >> Windows Platform Support Team > >> Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com > >> > >> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email > >> me; I'll post a response back to the group. > >> > >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > > rights. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> "Darren Mar-Elia" <dmanonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > >> message > >> news:O%23gY5kLeEHA.1732@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >> > Mark's right that you can set the "Always wait for the network at > >> > computer startup and logon" policy within any GPO--local or AD-based. > >> > However, this policy does also exist in Win2K--its just called > >> > something > >> > different. First off, note that all this policy in XP (and 2003) is > > doing > >> > is > >> > telling group policy to run synchronously during foreground processing > >> > (computer startup and logon). In XP (and maybe 2K3 as well--not sure), > > the > >> > default is to do foreground processing Asynchronously, which causes > >> > some > >> > "unexpected behavior" for certain policy (e.g. folder redirection). In > >> > Win2K, the default is to do foreground processing synchronously in the > >> > first > >> > place, but if you really want asynchronous processing, its available > >> > within > >> > two separate policies under Computer Configuration|Administrative > >> > Templates|System|Group Policy. Specifically the Apply Group Policy > >> > asynchronously for computers during startup (and for users during > >> > logon) > >> > policy items. > >> > > >> > Now in terms of managing local GPOs remotely, there is no easy 'batch' > >> > mechanism for doing this other than manually copying files around or > > using > >> > a > >> > 3rd party product like Full Armor's GPAnywhere, but you can > > interactively > >> > manage a remote local GPO simply by opening a blank MMC snap-in, > >> > loading > >> > the > >> > GP editor snap-in and browsing to the remote machine as you load the > >> > snap-in. > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Darren Mar-Elia > >> > MS-MVP-Windows Management > >> > http://www.gpoguy.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <markreno@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> > news:%23KjkcwBeEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >> >> Hi Jeff > >> >> > >> >> This information is inaccurate. This policy setting is available at > > the > >> >> domain level or at the level of any OU. The confusion may have come > >> >> about > >> >> because it's not a Windows 2000 setting. If you were creating the > > policy > >> >> from a Windows 2000 DC, you wouldn't see this setting by default. > >> >> Windows > >> >> XP and Windows Server 2003 have this setting in their appropriate .adm > >> >> files. If you create and manage the policy from one of these > >> >> operating > >> >> systems, you won't have an issue. > >> >> > >> >> You can't manage local GPO's remoted (afaik). > >> >> > >> >> Kind regards > >> >> -- > >> >> Mark Renoden [MSFT] > >> >> Windows Platform Support Team > >> >> Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com > >> >> > >> >> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to > > email > >> >> me; I'll post a response back to the group. > >> >> > >> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > >> > rights. > >> >> > >> >> "Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:83b801c47803$9d979ad0$a401280a@phx.gbl... > >> >> > Ok, I'm going to sound like the GPO newbie that I am... > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm reading this month's windows & .net mag, and the > >> >> > article is talking about deploying XPSP2 using GPO. The > >> >> > author suggests enabling "Always wait for the network at > >> >> > computer startup and logon policy under the GPO's > >> >> > Computer Configuration\Administrative > >> >> > Templates\System\Logon object" to ensure the policy is > >> >> > enforced. This policy is only available in the local > >> >> > GPO. So here is my question: > >> >> > > >> >> > Can local GPO's be remotely configured? If not, how does > >> >> > an organization implement local GPO changes system wide? > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
- Next message: larrydalooza: "Re: Automating Printer Installation"
- Previous message: Inoue210: "User internet access"
- In reply to: Mark Renoden [MSFT]: "Re: local GPO question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|