Re: Question about local security settings vs GPO's
From: Todd S (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Lejo: "Creating group Policies"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Applying user configuration settings to an OU containing only computer objects"
- In reply to: Jerold Schulman: "Re: Question about local security settings vs GPO's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 05:20:59 -0700
Thanks but I don't really see how that tip document helps.
>-----Original Message-----
>On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:18:50 -0700, "Todd S" <toddflbass@
{IHATESPAM}yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>When I start SECPOL.MSC on one of my XP workstations in
my
>>2000 domain and I look at the local security settings I
>>have several items that are defined. For example, 'Load
>>and Unload Device Drivers' is set to Administrators.
>>
>>Now when I run a RSoP on that same XP workstation the
>>computer setting is 'Not Configured'. No where in my AD
>>is that item defined. I was under the impression that
>>LSDOU (local site domain ou) was the way policies are
over
>>written but if they aren't configured in the upper part
of
>>the higharchy (an OU for example) then the lowest
setting
>>wins. If that is the case then how is the local
security
>>settings getting changes from defined to not defined?
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>
>See tip 4252 in the 'Tips & Tricks' at
http://www.jsiinc.com
>
>Jerold Schulman
>Windows: General MVP
>JSI, Inc.
>http://www.jsiinc.com
>.
>
- Next message: Lejo: "Creating group Policies"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: Applying user configuration settings to an OU containing only computer objects"
- In reply to: Jerold Schulman: "Re: Question about local security settings vs GPO's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
