Re: SPAM
- From: No Alternative <noalternative@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 07 May 2009 14:14:25 -0500, Bob I wrote:
No Alternative wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 13:48:12 -0500, Bob I wrote:No the real reason is that your post has zip, nada, zilch to do with
No Alternative wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 18:31:19 +0200, Pegasus [MVP] wrote:
"No Alternative" <noalternative@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message news:gtujo0$iek$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 07 May 2009 11:45:09 +0000, Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] wrote:
So, you say. How is it spam to ask if people have had good
experiences with other linux distros?
It wouldn't be spam if you posted the question in a relevant
newsgroup, i.e. in a linux-focused newsgroup. When you post it in a
Windows newsgroup then one is drawn to the conclusion that you're
trying to sell something - a product, a program, your ideas, your
convictions.
since this involves users of old windows and presumably old computers,
in the win.general categories, how is it not relevant?
Same reason it isn't relevant in a ford newsgroup, despite the fact the
ford owner has a computer.
so the real reason is brand zealotry. Like Coke vs Pepsi. I am not
into it. I buy what's on sale.
Windows 2000 therefor OFF TOPIC and Commercial in nature. It is called
SPAM.
It can be a replacement for windows 2000 on older computer so it is
general reference to it. This is a general discussion group. It is not
commercial as I a not offering anything that is for sale. I just wanted
to know if anyone else had found a good flavor of linux for that era of
computer. Linux is a free program, so it isn't commercial. You are just
engaging in silly strawman stuff, probably out of brand zealotry.
--
http://english-158465906205.spampoison.com
http://u-lite.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPAM
- From: Bob I
- Re: SPAM
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Screen Blanker after Screensaver
- Next by Date: Re: Screen Blanker after Screensaver
- Previous by thread: Re: SPAM
- Next by thread: Re: SPAM
- Index(es):