Re: virtual memory
- From: "philo" <philo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:15:03 -0500
"John John (MVP)" <audetweld@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ux0wSieNJHA.3480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Configuring paging files for optimization and recovery in Windows Server
2003, in Windows 2000, and in Windows NT
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/197379/
I'd say to go with what the article said.
However:
I've run some experiements to see if it made any difference which drive the
pagefile
was on and could not see any noticible difference
I suggested you put the page file on the same drive as you OS
because you seem to have very little free space on your 2nd drive...
If you had more free space there, I would have told you to just leave it
where it is, but simply increase the size
At any rate, for best results you should see about adding soem RAM
Johnbut
DL wrote:
Peoples have all sorts of technical opinions on the page file location,
has aI must confess I've not seen any MS reccomendation that the page file be
located on seperate hd to the system.
Generally the page file should be set to system managed, and generally
onmax size is 1.5*ram
BTW as philo states bumping up your ram to 512mb would likely lead to a
wonderous result.
260mb ram? do you have onboard graphics which is utilising sys ram?
Also is your file system NTFS?
"Gordon Biggar" <colonel_biggs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u$a63QeNJHA.4428@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for your very prompt response.
Technical question: the HELP section says to avoid placing pagefile.sys
vastthe same hard drive as one's system files. I would imagine that the
themajority of users only have one hard drive, but where there may be a
second
drive, your comment implies that you nonetheless prefer to place it on
forsame drive as where the system files are located.
What might be your rationale, or might your response be too technical
freea
non-tech to comprehend? !
Thanks again.
GGB
"philo" <philo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:evqVc6aNJHA.3476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Gordon Biggar" <colonel_biggs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uzdhP3YNJHA.2100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I write a lot of Word programs (Office 2000) in which I am inserting
photos,
etc. Of late, I am receiving virtual memory warnings, the system
saying
that I am low on virtual memory, and that it is going to have to
increase
same. My programs are not terminated, however.
I have a 200 gig hard drive (C:) with 260 MB of RAM. There is 87%
MB).space, and my Word files are only a few meg, or so, in size. Virtual
memory
on my C drive is set for 400-450 MB.
I read in the HELP section that the pagefile.sys should preferably not
be
located on the same drive with other system files. Since I have
another
hard drive (E: 4 gig free), I set up a file on that drive (450-500
I
have not had the problem since, but somehow this seems like a great
waste
of
system resources.
Should the pagefile on the C drive be set to zero? Or, is something
else
creating the virtual memory warnings?
Thanks in advance for all comments.
Regards,
Gordon Biggar
Houston, Texas
I'd put it back on the same drive as your OS
but set the maximum size up to perhaps 800 megs
BTW: it would not hurt to bump your RAM up to at least 512 megs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: virtual memory
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: virtual memory
- References:
- virtual memory
- From: Gordon Biggar
- Re: virtual memory
- From: philo
- Re: virtual memory
- From: Gordon Biggar
- Re: virtual memory
- From: DL
- Re: virtual memory
- From: John John (MVP)
- virtual memory
- Prev by Date: Re: ntbackup force overwrite
- Next by Date: Re: Ghosting Issue
- Previous by thread: Re: virtual memory
- Next by thread: Re: virtual memory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|