NTLDR is missing on bootup
W2K/SP4
My install has been rock-solid for about a year. I practically never
install anything, mainly use small executables, no problems.
I have net browsing patterns I used for years in W98SE and now W2K, no
funnies there, I browse with images/javascript disabled normally. I only
use Firefox, Xnews, DUN.
Cold boot each AM. Clean trash each shutdown, same every day.
Yesterday was a typical day, usual sites, saved usual text, edited usual
text. Absolutely nothing unusual or abnormal.
This morning, on bootup, black screen before BIOS display: NTLDR is
missing. Can't boot up,
1. Why, out of nowhere, does this happen?
2. How to fix it?
TIA
ms
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: OT Techie help please
... I logged on under my sons log in and tried to install the software but it just gave me the option to un install it ... I would ensure that both the Software is uninstalled from both ID's and that the Hardware Drivers are uninstalled from both ID's then cold boot. ... Double click on the USB Dongle ... (uk.rec.competitions) - Which bootloader to use ?
... The system I am currently developing is a Geode based CE.5 device. ... system will install CE from a Compact Flash designated as drive C:. ... The device will NOT be battery backed, however the customer would like the ... option for the system to suspend / resume or cold boot. ... (microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder) - Re: Embedded C++ or .NET CF?
... > that can be used to download and install .NET and my other components. ... that's easy with a symbol device: ... On a cold boot the device will "execute" files of the type .cpy and .reg. ... this folder. ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework) - Re: Anyone have experience with building Windows executables with free Common Lisp implementations?
... And delivering executables is not only what ... You said you're targeting Windows. ... install CLisp in a common subfolder and reuse it as you wish. ... the free implementations shows that their implementers are biased to ... (comp.lang.lisp) - Re: Absolute path in argv[0]
... The config will still be in /etc. ... This is the case nowadays even if you personally install in /usr/local - ... should be allowed to USE the same executables in different ... Nobody is suggesting they compile it in, as much as define a default ... (comp.os.linux.misc) |
|