Re: Terminal Services
- From: "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I.can@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:51:43 +1000
Lots of questions here! I'll try to answer the ones I can - see below.
"jeffuk123" <jeffuk123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8865F73F-BC1C-4C9E-8A6D-62B042CCD3FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello to all,Server.
I apologise if some of my topic relates to other forums but here is the
situaion in order that you can understand:-
Basically, my question relates to terminal services on a Windows 2000
Company.
(1) The scenario:-
One of our clients has Windows 2000 Server, setup via an existing IT
DG814,
(2) My Goal:-
I need to setup Terminal Services in order that the customer can log in
remotely to the server and use a database program, as well as check other
things.
(3) Current Setup:-
. The server connects directly to a DG814 ADSL modem/router, which in turn
is connected to a FVS318 Prosafe VPN Firewall 8-Port Switch for additional
port connections for users.
. They get internet access etc fine.
. The default gateway is set to 192.168.0.1
(4) What I have done or tested:-
I'm confused as to which of the hardware i.e. the FVS318 or the DG814 is
supplying the default gateway address. I would have thought it was the
but when entering the ip address of 192.168.0.1 into a web browser, itlogs
straight in to the FVS318 Prosafe VPN Firewall 8-Port Switch! I don't know
how to log into the DG814 ADSL modem/router. I'm confused.
The Default Gateway says where internal packets should be sent
if their scope is outside your internal subnet (192.168.0). This is
obviously your firewall.
If you don't know your ADSL modem/router's internal IP address
then you should connect some PC directly to it and get it to obtain
an IP address from the modem/router's DHCP server. If the modem/
router is set up correctly then this address would be on a subnet
that is different from 192.168.0.
Anyway, I added port 3389 to the FVS318 and forwarded it to the ip addressbut I
of the server. I wondered if port 3389 needed adding to the DG814 also,
don't know how to log into this if 192.168.0.1 logs directly into theFVS318.
I assume your ADSL modem/router acts as a moment only and that
it passes all incoming packets on to a DMZ device, which is your
firewall. If this is correct then there is no need to add any port
forwarding
rules to the ADSL modem/router.
Terminal services was already installed. I just added the appropriateusers
to 'remote desktop users' and gave them appropriate permissions in'Terminal
Services Configuration'.
When I tested an external terminal services connection to the server it
would not connect.
You should start by testing your terminal services internally from some
networked PC by running this command:
telnet YourServer 3389
(5) Basically, my questions are:-to
a) Is there anything else I need to do in Windows 2000 Server to be able
log in remotely?
You have to start Terminal Services.
b) They do not have terminal services licensing. If I manage to get itthe
working will remote administration mode be sufficient? I do not know how
existing guy setup Terminal Services.
It should be "Application Mode" but I'm not sure what the
consequences are if it's "Administration Mode".
c) Do you feel that it would be more appropriate to obtain an all-in-oneDG814
ADSL router with the appropriate number of ports and do away with the
and FVS318?
Much cheaper to set up the existing ADSL modem/router as a
modem/router (provided that it has port forwarding facilities)
and to connect it to a switch for extra ports.
d) How do I log into the DG814?
By typing its IP address into a browser - see above.
e) Is it likely that the DG814 and/or the FVS318 are the problems? Evenis
though remote login is the only problem they are having? Everything else
fine.
No.
A great thanks and appreciation to anyone who takes the time to answer myin
depth questions
Kind regards,
Jeff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Seahawk60B
- Re: Terminal Services
- References:
- Terminal Services
- From: jeffuk123
- Terminal Services
- Prev by Date: Terminal Services
- Next by Date: Re: Support for Windows 2000
- Previous by thread: Terminal Services
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal Services
- Index(es):