Re: Shared drive vs a share
- From: "Dave Patrick" <DSPatrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 07:42:53 -0600
They are one and the same. Also look at mountvol and subst commands.
--
Regards,
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"Prem Mehrotra" wrote:
| There appears to be some difference in a shared drive vs a share. I know
when
| I run a java program installed on a share, it gives me security errors,
but
| when I run the
| Program installed on a shared drive it works fine.
|
| Shared drive appears as a local drive on my desktop. However a share does
| not. My data center people set shared drive. Share was set by me where I
went
| to server and allowed a folder to be shared by my LAN login.
|
| I will like to know how to setup a shared drive instead of share.
|
|
| Thanks.
|
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Dynamic Volume
- Next by Date: Re: Shared drive vs a share
- Previous by thread: Re: Please Help - Urgent
- Next by thread: Re: Shared drive vs a share
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
