Re: 3rd party service being interrogated/stopped; short term solution?
- From: "Dave Patrick" <DSPatrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:49:00 -0700
Cross-post when necessary, but never multi-post. Cross-posting is when you
include two or more groups in the "Newsgroups:" section. In this scenario
the message and all responses are seen in all groups that the message was
cross-posted to. In other words any replies will automatically propagate to
the other newsgroup posts.
Multi-posting is when you post the same message to two or more groups
individually. In this scenario the message is seen in the groups it is
posted to, but the responses are only seen attached to the message (unless
you cross-post the reply) in which the response was made. So those that
frequent these groups then need to deal with or re-read the posts. It may
seem like a small thing to keep track of. But some of us actively traverse
50 or more groups. The poster also then must search out all of the posts to
see if there was a response.
--
Regards,
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"jennmk" <jennmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FBAA0D35-C8A2-42DD-859F-0B68F78A273E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| After weeks of troubleshooting an older vendor application that has been
| hanging, the vendor has identified that the application service that
handles
| connection pooling, etc. is being stopped. We are at the height of the
| season for this application so we have two choices: 1)implement a newer
| service release by the vendor that fixes this situation (no on likes this
| idea because of the timing) 2) based on what we see in the event log, the
| service is being interrogated three times and then shuts down; the vendor
| thinks we can disable the service that is doing the interrogation as a
| temporary fix; claiming this has worked in the past as a short-term
solution
| until the updated service release can be applied and thoroughly tested.
He
| believes it to possibly be WMI that is doing a check on all services and
if
| it doesn't get a proper response back, it shuts it off. Does this sound
| right? Would WMI do this? Any help or thoughts would be greatly
appreciated.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Installation error
- Next by Date: Re: Start Button Sticks In and Does Not Display Start Menu
- Previous by thread: Re: Installation error
- Next by thread: Re: Start Button Sticks In and Does Not Display Start Menu
- Index(es):