Re: Server to Server communication sucks in Windows 2000
- From: "Dave Patrick" <DSPatrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:37:42 -0600
George, there's a big difference between unbind and remove. Unbinding is
unchecking the service from a specific device. Removing removes the service
from the machine.
If I read the article correctly a three under "This symptom occurs if:" must
be true else the article does not apply.
--
Regards,
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"George Hester" wrote:
| Dave I just tried following this article at Microsoft:
|
| http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q135404/
|
| Do you know what this does? It said to remove the File and Printer
Sharing
| and the Client for Networks from the the NIC which is not the dedicated
| adapter. Well I did that and the result was these protocols and Services
| were removed from ALL the NICs. I think it is normal given the setup I
have
| because I don't see anything that is NOT normal in the set up and I see
ALOT
| orf Knowledge Base articles and Service Pack updates to exactly what I am
| experiencing.
|
| --
| George Hester
| _________________________________
.
- References:
- Re: Server to Server communication sucks in Windows 2000
- From: George Hester
- Re: Server to Server communication sucks in Windows 2000
- Prev by Date: Re: Manage XP clients in ADUC?
- Next by Date: Re: Server to Server communication sucks in Windows 2000
- Previous by thread: Re: Server to Server communication sucks in Windows 2000
- Next by thread: Re: Server to Server communication sucks in Windows 2000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
