Re: Is XP faster than 2000?
- From: Dewey <dewey3kNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 May 2005 18:57:20 GMT
"=?Utf-8?B?dGhlIGZyaWVuZGx5IGRpc3BsYXkgbmFtZQ==?="
<thefriendlydisplayname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:75215A9D-A7D3-4E35-A071-3FD905937C3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Hello newsgroup.
>
> Since years i ran on this PC (Athlon XP 2000+, 512 MB Ram, 80 GB HD)
> Windows 2000. I've got now from a friend a XP pro CD with license
> (don't worry, it's competely legal, he didn't installed it on his PC
> before, in fact, the package is un-opened).
>
> Should I upgrade my PC to XP? I've read that XP is faster than 2000,
> is it true? That is my main concern, if it isn't faster, or even if it
> is slower, I won't upgrade.
>
> What is your experience speedwise, XP or 2000?
Perhaps anecdotal but my father has a bigger, faster computer than I have
and he runs XP while I run 2k on my laptop and my laptop seems far more
stable and faster. YMMV.
.
- References:
- Is XP faster than 2000?
- From: the friendly display name
- Is XP faster than 2000?
- Prev by Date: Is XP faster than 2000?
- Next by Date: Re: Is XP faster than 2000?
- Previous by thread: Is XP faster than 2000?
- Next by thread: Re: Is XP faster than 2000?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|