Re: No of Proceesors for Windows 2000 Server
- From: "Andrew Morton" <akm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:16:40 +0100
> A software vendor has advised us to add another 2
> processors to our Windows 2000 server running SQL Server
> 2000. This would bring us up to the “4GB limit”. Can
> someone please advise me whether windows server 2000 can
> run with four processors? I seem to remember that it can
> only cope with two. Should we be better upgrading the
> Server version to 2003 instead?
It's Windows 2000 Professional that works with only one or two processors.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/sysreqs/default.asp
What makes you relate the number of processors to the amount of RAM?
Is the bottleneck the amount of processing power available, the amount of
RAM available, network bandwidth or disk drive access?
Andrew
.
- References:
- No of Proceesors for Windows 2000 Server
- From: Alastair MacFarlane
- No of Proceesors for Windows 2000 Server
- Prev by Date: Re: No of Proceesors for Windows 2000 Server
- Next by Date: Re: Drive D: shows 90% full even if 60 % free
- Previous by thread: Re: No of Proceesors for Windows 2000 Server
- Next by thread: all install or setup runs on windows process task manager
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|