RE: .Net Framework 1.0 v/s 1.1
From: Crouchie1998 (Crouchie1998_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Richard provost Sr: "Windows 2000"
- Previous message: Andrew Beary: "Will a Win2K reinstall recover from lost password??"
- In reply to: Bill: ".Net Framework 1.0 v/s 1.1"
- Next in thread: Torgeir Bakken \(MVP\): "Re: .Net Framework 1.0 v/s 1.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:05:03 -0700
Hi Bill
I am a developer
There are 2 programs out: Visual Studio.NET 2002 & 2003.
Visual Studio.NET 2002 uses the .NET Framework 1.0 & Visual Studio.NET 2003
uses the .NET Framework 1.1
>From a programming point of view. The Framework 1.0 never had a few controls
(Folder Browser Disalog) for example, but the 1.1 Framework does
Also, Microsoft wants everyone (developers) to be using Visual Studio.NET
2003, which means the 1.1 Framework
Also, if you have IIS installed on your machine then you should change it to
the 1.1 Framework
I hope this brief explanation helps
"Bill" wrote:
> Having just been prompted to download on my W2k
> system .NetFramework 1.1. SP1 and 1.0 SP3 English, I again
> wondered why I have two versions of this software.
>
> Trying to re-search this I since read a lot all over about
> that software, all mainly very technical in nature, but
> nowhere do I find some layman's information re does
> version 1.1. replace 1.0 or, if not, what the differences
> are and why I need both.
>
> I'm not a developer or techie, so my down to earth
> question is:
>
> Do I need both or only the latest 1.1. version, i.e.
> can/should I remove via the add/remove function version
> 1.0?
>
> Thanks.
>
- Next message: Richard provost Sr: "Windows 2000"
- Previous message: Andrew Beary: "Will a Win2K reinstall recover from lost password??"
- In reply to: Bill: ".Net Framework 1.0 v/s 1.1"
- Next in thread: Torgeir Bakken \(MVP\): "Re: .Net Framework 1.0 v/s 1.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
