Re: cluster size
From: Mike Brearley (mike_brearleyNOSPAM_at_DONTDOIThotmail.com)
Date: 03/01/04
- Next message: Gerry Voras: "Re: recycle bin"
- Previous message: gian: "Re: hotfix (see q321856 for more information), But Where?"
- In reply to: Gerry Voras: "Re: cluster size"
- Next in thread: Rick: "Re: cluster size"
- Reply: Rick: "Re: cluster size"
- Reply: Gerry Voras: "Re: cluster size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:34:54 -0500
NTFS in Windows 2003. Running Exchange, IIS and acting as a file server.
-- Posted 'as is'. If there are any spelling and/or grammar mistakes, they were a direct result of my fingers and brain not being synchronized or my lack of caffeine. Mike Brearley "Gerry Voras" <gerry.voras@nextaction.com> wrote in message news:%23q0pCS9$DHA.1224@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Depends on the file system. And I'd say from there that using the defaults > would be best for memory allocation purposes. > > "Mike Brearley" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:aH2c1r8$DHA.3956@faerybug-01.faerybug.com... > > I set up a new server using 16k cluster size on the hard drive (raid 5 > array > > using Promise S150 SX4 and 4 WD120GB Sata drives. > > > > Basically, the performance sucks! I'd like to know what would be a good > > cluster size or any other tips as to how to improve performance. > > > > -- > > Posted 'as is'. If there are any spelling and/or grammar mistakes, they > > were a direct result of my fingers and brain not being synchronized or my > > lack of caffeine. > > > > Mike Brearley (mike_brearley at hotmail dot com) > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Gerry Voras: "Re: recycle bin"
- Previous message: gian: "Re: hotfix (see q321856 for more information), But Where?"
- In reply to: Gerry Voras: "Re: cluster size"
- Next in thread: Rick: "Re: cluster size"
- Reply: Rick: "Re: cluster size"
- Reply: Gerry Voras: "Re: cluster size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|