Re: W2K SP4 Hosed our PC - Need Help !!!

From: Steve N. (NoOne_at_nunya.biz)
Date: 03/01/04


Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 04:18:29 GMT


George Hester wrote:

> I don't agree. SP3 fixed issues that were not fixed in SP2 which
> fixed issues that were not fixed in SP1 which fixed issues that came
> with Windows 2000.
>
> Now SP4. I'm not going to get into "It's all the service pack's
> fault" because in Windows 2000 Professional I have no issues. In the
> Server well that's a different matter. And yes there is an issue
> with SP4 in the server. The issue is compounded by having Internet
> Explorer 6 installed.
>
> But the issue is really slight and just results in an Error being
> written to the Event Viewer and in fact another issue where the Event
> Viewer stops functionaing. Easily fixed. Not the former but I know
> of no earlier Service Packs that came out to "fix" an earlier one.
>

This is not the case im my experience with Win2K Pro (not Server) and
SP4, as evidenced in my posts in this thread. If you care to address
some of the issues I have had (and others have had) in this by all means
please do. And by all means please elaborate on exactly WHAT you do not
agree with that I've written.

It seems to me that you wrote:

"SP3 fixed issues that were not fixed in SP2 which fixed issues that
were not fixed in SP1 which fixed issues that came with Windows 2000."

Which is in part in agreement with some of what I wrote, except that I
added that in MY experience (and obviously in that of others) it is
often the case that there are things "fixed" and other things "broken"
with service packs (and not just M$'s SPs either).

All I am saying is that I have seen very many Win2K Pro PCs hosed by SP4
that were otherwise working just fine. I gave my experiencial evidence
and repeatable evidence, which I have done a fair job of suplying
symptoms for here. Care to comment on anything specific? It'd be nice if
someone could come up with exactly WHAT gets broken with SP4, WHY, and
under WHAT circumstances. Maybe M$ would be able to actually FIX it
then, instead of avoiding the issues. I've contributed my experiences. I
don't have any answers except that if SP4 causes problems then remove
it. It has proven beyond any doubt to me and many others to be
problematic. If you haven't had the problems, then good for you. Me and
a lot of others have.

Steve



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do I want SP1 or SP4 in a new machine?
    ... If you're talking about Windows XP, SP1 is the latest Service ... Pack. ... There is no SP4. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: iexplore.exe
    ... Gibt es weitere iexplore.exe Dateien in anderen Verzeichnissen? ... Es gibt keine mehr für Windows XP SP1. ... Windows 2000 wird von MS nach wie vor supported und ist damit die ... Support" für Windows 2000 SP4, am 13.07.2010) mit Updates versorgt wird. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.inetexplorer.ie6)
  • Windows SP4 breaks a VB3 application - why?
    ... I am running an application (ISM3) developed in VB3 by the ... However, after Windows 2000 SP4 has been installed, ... SP1 and it was fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.applications)
  • GPF in module KRNL386.EXE afterWin 2k SP4 installed
    ... I am running an application (ISM3) developed in VB3 by the ... However, after Windows 2000 SP4 has been installed, ... only had Windows 2000 SP1 installed and it worked fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.bugs)
  • Why did Windows 2000 SP4 break VB3 application?
    ... I am running an application (ISM3) developed in VB3 by the ... However, after Windows 2000 SP4 has been installed, ... SP1 and it was fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.windows_update)