Re: Installing .Net Compiler on Win2K -- Upgrade Question
From: George Hester (hesterloli_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/29/04
- Next message: Dmitry: "windows folder options"
- Previous message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: W2K SP4 Hosed our PC - Need Help !!!"
- In reply to: Steven O.: "Installing .Net Compiler on Win2K -- Upgrade Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:13:09 -0500
No that will not happen. Remember the IDE for Framework 1.1 came out before SP4 or at least very close to each other. Check the Readme first for the install of Visual Studio.NET. If what you think is true it will say so in there under System Requirements.
-- George Hester __________________________________ "Steven O." <Steven@OpZZREMOVE_ALL_Zs_AND_ALL_BETWEEN_ZZComm.com> wrote in message news:f2o14099ikcasq7tnv605g9q0t0ltccl1p@4ax.com... > I am considering installing the .Net IDE and Compiler on my Win2K > system. However, a friend tells me that since I have Win2K SP3, the > .Net installation software will, in essence, insist on first upgrading > my system to SP4. Is this correct? > > This is a problem, because I've found in the past that with SP4 > installed, Win2K runs slow as a sloth. (I had to rebuild my system, > sticking with SP3.) So, please advise if this is, in fact the case, > that the SP4 "upgrade" is unavoidable with .Net on Win2K. > > Thanks in advance for all replies. > > Steve O.
- Next message: Dmitry: "windows folder options"
- Previous message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: W2K SP4 Hosed our PC - Need Help !!!"
- In reply to: Steven O.: "Installing .Net Compiler on Win2K -- Upgrade Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
