Re: Other personal firewalls besides Norton?

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Bruce Chambers (bchambers_at_nospamcableone.net)
Date: 02/13/04


Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:33:39 -0700

Greetings --

    You make a good point, however even good hardware firewalls (and
NAT-capable routers) do nothing to protect the user from him/herself.
Again -- and I _cannot_ emphasize this enough -- almost all spyware
and many Trojans and worms are downloaded and installed (albeit
carelessly or unknowingly) by the user. So a software firewall, such
as Sygate or ZoneAlarm, that can detect and warn the user of
unauthorized out-going traffic is an important element of protecting
one's privacy and security. Most antivirus applications do not scan
for, identify, or protect you from adware/spyware, because, after
all, you've installed them yourself, so you must want them there,
right?

    I use both a router with NAT and Sygate Personal Firewall, even
though I generally know better than to install scumware. When it
comes to computer security and protecting my privacy, I prefer the old
"belt and suspenders" approach.

Bruce Chambers

--
Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You can have peace.  Or you can have freedom.  Don't ever count on 
having both at once. -- RAH
"Pete" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:83DDF475-BFDE-452D-B370-8450B6E90193@microsoft.com...
> There are 2 answers to this question:
>
> 1) Yes, there are many software firewalls available.  Personally, I 
> use Zone Alarm by Zone Labs.  However, changing your firewall 
> software may not make your connectivity to the Internet any easier. 
> That is the trade-off -- Better protection, difficult configuration.
>
> 2) How about a router?  Yes, you're right.  That is a question for a 
> question, but you may want to consider this as another option.  A 
> router is a network devise that allows you to route IP addresses in 
> very special ways.  In addition, many routers that are available 
> today, especially routers specifically designed for internet 
> connectivity, have very nice firewall capabilities.  They are 
> extremely easy to set up.  Take a look at Linksys.  That one works 
> very nicely.
>
> Just by what you have described in your post, I would recommend 
> option 2.  It does cost more up front, but the easabiliy and 
> security is well worth it.
>
> --
> Pete
> http://www.websolutionpro.com
> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hardware vs Software
    ... ZoneAlarm, that can detect and warn the user of unauthorized out-going ... Most antivirus applications do not scan for or protect you ... software firewall in place, your only intrusion protection is the ... everyone always responds with "install NIS" ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: SP2 and hardware firewalls
    ... > report no security holes. ... 3rd party software firewall. ... NAT-capable routers do nothing to protect the user from him/herself ... though I generally know better than to install scumware. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Wireless Routers & Software Firewalls
    ... > Is it true that because I have a Hardware Router that I don't ... > to use a Software Firewall? ... NAT-capable routers do nothing to protect the user from him/herself ... though I generally know better than to install scumware. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: XP SP2 Firewall...is it good?
    ... > I forgot to mention I also have a router which supposedly has a firewall ... 3rd party software firewall. ... NAT-capable routers do nothing to protect the user from him/herself ... though I generally know better than to install scumware. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Windows Firewall and Routers
    ... party software firewall. ... routers do nothing to protect the user from him/herself (or any "curious," ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)