Re: 128GB FAT32 Volume with a 32K cluster size
anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com
Date: 05/03/04
- Next message: andrea catto': "Re: Deleting Directories with BAT File"
- Previous message: Joep: "Re: Corrupted FAT"
- In reply to: Al Dykes: "Re: 128GB FAT32 Volume with a 32K cluster size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 16:20:54 -0700
Well mybee you are right, I created a 32Gb FAT32 Volume,
I will try this and if no luck looks like I will need to
go RAID 0.
Right now I am using ATA133 but have onbarod SATA RAID
that I am not using.
>-----Original Message-----
>In article <7b2401c43136$cf68bf80$a301280a@phx.gbl>,
> <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>Al,
>>
>>Even for multi track audio recording, ie: 30 80mb files
>>streaming???
>>
>
>I don't know why not. Doesn't the fact that there is a
4GB/file limit
>in FAT32 make FAT32 a deadend for video editing ?
>
>File system copmpression is one if the underappreciated
features of
>NTFS. Turn the compression attribute on for the drive
(or folder(s))
>that have your data. It will trasparently compress and
decompress your
>data streams. I've been using it for 10 years, and seen
compressions
>as high as 20:1 (admitedly for huge, files that had
nothing but the
>numbers and whitespace.) The is no downside to
compression of files
>that are written or extended. Files that are updated
(ie databases)
>are not a good idea. It will work (I've done it) but
inserting data
>will get weird.
>
>Right Mouse Click/Properties on a file or folder and
will show you the
>size, and size on disk.
>
>
>
>>and what about
>>>>in the format window it ask for allocation unit size,
>>if
>>>>I select 32K does is this the same as a 32K cluster
>>size?
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>In article <795801c43133$5b3bb7f0$a501280a@phx.gbl>,
>>>Tim <songquester@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>Yes I am having the same problem in Win2K SP4, I need
>>>>volumes larger than 32GB. Is there another way
around
>>>>this besides having to use Win98.
>>>>Also I was told for multi track audio recording to
use
>>>>FAT32 with a 32K cluster size. Another question is
when
>>>>in the format window it ask for allocation unit size,
>>if
>>>>I select 32K does is this the same as a 32K cluster
>>size?
>>>>
>>>>Please help
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Use NTFS.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Al Dykes
>>>-----------
>>>adykes at p a n i x . c o m
>>>.
>>>
>
>
>--
>Al Dykes
>-----------
>adykes at p a n i x . c o m
>.
>
- Next message: andrea catto': "Re: Deleting Directories with BAT File"
- Previous message: Joep: "Re: Corrupted FAT"
- In reply to: Al Dykes: "Re: 128GB FAT32 Volume with a 32K cluster size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
