Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: "Herb Martin" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:25:11 -0600
"Ace Fekay [MVP]" <PleaseAskMe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eV2UQRDGHHA.3616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In news:1165281377.576717.6730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Nico2005 <nterreault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated, which I commented on below:
Its on the same subnet
1 domain is on a 10.10.1.1
the 2nd domain is on a 192.168.1.1
with both having subnet 255.255.255.0
is it possible only with a switch or i really need a router ???
because i need a trust to move stuff from one domain to the other and
after shutdown the first domain.
I dont know if its will be more easy just to start from scratch (only
have 17 users) both my problem is i dont want to redo all security.
But if its more easy i will start from scratch
Thanks again.
Switches "route" (hate to use that term with a switch since it is
confusing to many who are not fully familiar with it), by discerning the
MAC address on each port.
What you describe is 'bridging' (Based on MAC) address and
that is what MANY but not all switches do. Routing should NOT
be used to describe these switches. (I.e., Layer 2 switches).
Other switches actually DO "route" and that is the proper term
to use when referring to those switches (layer 3 or router switches.)
And of course some switches do both (usually more expensive and
complex devices.)
You are asking what you need to "route" IP addresses between different
subnets, therefore, the answer is you need a router.
In general he needs a ROUTER (or a switch that is a router)
to route between two different network address ranges.
It is technically possible to do this without an explicit router
by setting every (and every) machine to understand that these
two networks are on the same physical broadcast domain (i.e.,
same actual segment, or bridges segments) but this is an unusual
and perhaps error prone way to do this.
--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]
"Ace Fekay [MVP]" <PleaseAskMe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eV2UQRDGHHA.3616@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In news:1165281377.576717.6730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Nico2005 <nterreault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated, which I commented on below:
Its on the same subnet
1 domain is on a 10.10.1.1
the 2nd domain is on a 192.168.1.1
with both having subnet 255.255.255.0
is it possible only with a switch or i really need a router ???
because i need a trust to move stuff from one domain to the other and
after shutdown the first domain.
I dont know if its will be more easy just to start from scratch (only
have 17 users) both my problem is i dont want to redo all security.
But if its more easy i will start from scratch
Thanks again.
Switches "route" (hate to use that term with a switch since it is
confusing to many who are not fully familiar with it), by discerning the
MAC address on each port. Each NIC has a unique MAC address and therefore
traffic between ports can be restricted for two machines to those ports
only. It makes the network more efficient. Hubs do not route, but are just
bit repeaters that repeat the traffic on ALL ports. Routers "route" by
discerning IP subnets.
You are asking what you need to "route" IP addresses between different
subnets, therefore, the answer is you need a router.
If you know your seven layers (OSI model), that will help understand what
device works on what layers and why. From the top down, it goes smarter to
dumber. Disregarding the first top three, since they are considered
"application" layers, and the 4th, which is the Transport layer (TCP, UDP
and SPX work here, as well as NAT devices and anything else that uses TCP
or UDP), Network layer is where IP addresses live. Routers work on that
layer. Datalink is where the MAC addresses live. Bridges and switches
(multi port bridges) live here. Physical has no intelligence, hence why
they repeat. The smarter it is (going up the stack), the more intricate
the device is and the more expensive it will be. Hence why routers cost
more than switches.
(Application requesting network activity)
|
App
Presentation
Session
Transport (TCP, UDP, SPX, etc)
Network (IP, IPX) (routers work on this layer)
Datalink (MAC) (Bridges, Switches)
Physical (Hubs)
|
wire plugged into the network
--
Ace
Innovative IT Concepts, Inc (IITCI)
Willow Grove, PA
This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.
Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Having difficulty reading or finding responses to your post?
Instead of the website you're using, I suggest to use OEx (Outlook Express
or any other newsreader), and configure a news account, pointing to
news.microsoft.com. This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public
Newsgroups. It is FREE and requires NO ISP's Usenet account. OEx allows
you to easily find, track threads, cross-post, sort by date, poster's
name, watched threads or subject.
It's easy:
How to Configure OEx for Internet News
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=171164
Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations
Assimilation Imminent. Resistance is Futile
"Very funny Scotty. Now, beam down my clothes."
The only constant in life is change...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- References:
- DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: Nico2005
- Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
- Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: Herb Martin
- Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: Nico2005
- Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- From: Ace Fekay [MVP]
- DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- Prev by Date: Re: External DNS Servers
- Next by Date: Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- Previous by thread: Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- Next by thread: Re: DNS replication on 2 domain on 2 forests
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
