Re: Slave DNS server not taking over.
- From: "Frank Röder [MVP]" <heidenau@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:41:00 +0200
techjohnny@xxxxxxxxx schrieb:
Hello, Group:
I've got an Active Directory providing the primary DNS to clients, and
the backup DNS server is running Bind 9 as a slave.
This configuration is an security risk. Change the zone type to "AD integrated" so you can permit "secure updates". For secondary DNS-Servers the "AD integrated" Zone looks like an standard primary zone.
Today, the primary DNS server failed, but the clients still couldn't
resolve, even though I was able to manually use the nslookup, change
servers, and verify that the slave responded to requests from clients.
The clients are using DHCP and have a primary and secondary dns server,
but the secondary doesn't automatically kick in when the primary fails.
The slave dns server is properly receiving requests from the primary
and the zones are all up-to-date.
Do you tested the SRV-RECORDS with nslookup on the secondary server?
For example:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816587/en-us
--
Viele Grüße
Frank Röder
MVP Windows Server System - Directory Services
"Ex oriente lux"
.
- References:
- Slave DNS server not taking over.
- From: techjohnny
- Slave DNS server not taking over.
- Prev by Date: Re: DNS return random incorrect query responce ie request yahoo.com and get google.com
- Next by Date: Re: Slave DNS server not taking over.
- Previous by thread: Slave DNS server not taking over.
- Next by thread: Re: Slave DNS server not taking over.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|