Re: Records deleted from DNS primary didn't get updated on DNS Secondary
From: Herb Martin (news_at_LearnQuick.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Tony Eversole: "Re: In DNS-ADI, is the DNS info replicated to DC's via FRS ?"
- Previous message: Marlon Brown: "Re: Records deleted from DNS primary didn't get updated on DNS Secondary"
- In reply to: Marlon Brown: "Re: Records deleted from DNS primary didn't get updated on DNS Secondary"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:53:43 -0600
"Marlon Brown" <marlon_brown@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OEOQ9u7GFHA.2276@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hmmm... but let's see here. Isn't the serial# the one that controls if the
> zones will get transferred to the secondary DNS server ? I mean, if the
> secondary has a number higher than the primary, that could be because
there
> is no need to transfer zones at given time. Therefore this not necessarily
a
> malfunction, but rather a normal behavior ?
No, it is almost always wrong.
If the zones transferred correctly the numbers
would be EQUAL.
Then the next time a change happened on the
primary it would transfer since Primary would
increment by 1.
- Next message: Tony Eversole: "Re: In DNS-ADI, is the DNS info replicated to DC's via FRS ?"
- Previous message: Marlon Brown: "Re: Records deleted from DNS primary didn't get updated on DNS Secondary"
- In reply to: Marlon Brown: "Re: Records deleted from DNS primary didn't get updated on DNS Secondary"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading