Re: Possible DNS problem
From: Ace Fekay [MVP] (PleaseSubstituteMyActualFirstName&LastNameHere_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: New to DNS: "DNS & Forwarders"
- Previous message: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Another XP SP2 Issue"
- In reply to: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: Possible DNS problem"
- Next in thread: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Possible DNS problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:11:50 -0500
In news:eBKch%23wEFHA.2180@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] <admin@nospam.WFTX.US> made a post then I
commented below
>> U-turns? Interesting way to put it, but accurate! I think
>> you got that from your old trucking days!
>
> You got that right!
>
> Besides, If the firewall is worth its stuff, it would reject the
> packets as spoofed packets, anyway.
I figured it was from your driving days!
Many a firewall we have to state to ignore that range in the rules, such as
a Cisco IOS IP access rules (the way I used to do it). Not sure about the
newer ones, but I would assume it would have to be stated. But that is for
inbound, not inside requests hitting the inside interface for the outside
WAN interface. As for NAT, all NATs don't allow U-Turns, just as a traffic
cop!
Ace
- Next message: New to DNS: "DNS & Forwarders"
- Previous message: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Another XP SP2 Issue"
- In reply to: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: Possible DNS problem"
- Next in thread: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Possible DNS problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|