Re: Question about using .LOCAL and .COM

From: Herb Martin (news_at_LearnQuick.com)
Date: 03/09/04


Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:46:10 -0600


"Kyle Burns" <kburns@REMOVE.NOSPAM.humana.com> wrote in message
news:Orw3RweBEHA.3796@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Herb,
> I'm glad I asked! I've had my domain name for three years and didn't
> realize that it wasn't necessary for the company hosting my site to manage
> the DNS. I checked out my options for having the registrar (network
> solutions) manage the DNS and will use that service. That out of the way,
> it looks like all that's really left in regards to being able to
> successfully exchange mail will be to take care of the reverse issue that
> you raised with SBC. Thanks for setting me straight.

Sure man, took me years to work all this out. Not because it is hard but
because there really was no one convenient to ask then.

I am actually amazed at how well my MS DNS has worked all these years
considering how little I knew when I started. (Good defaults, good GUI,
I'm logical, AND I got lucky A LOT. <grin>)

-- 
Herb Martin
>
>
> "Herb Martin" <news@LearnQuick.com> wrote in message
> news:e$uJOtUBEHA.2308@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > 1) Installed Windows 2000 Server and configured it as an Active
> Directory
> > DC
> > > for "mydomain.local"
> > > 2) Installed Exchange 2000
> > > 3) Placed my order for DSL service with 5 static IP addresses
> > >
> > > I've been told by SBC that I will be managing my own DNS.  I'm
familiar
> > with
> > > creating records in DNS, but am not 100% sure of what I have to
> initially
> > do
> > > as the source of the records.  I _think_ that what I have left to do
is:
> >
> > It's a poor policy to manage your own EXTERNAL DNS unless you have
> > a rather large company and a significant reason.  Let the REGISTRAR do
it.
> > Register with someone like Register.com (or move to them) and let their
> > 24/7 fault tolerant servers do the job.
> >
> > You still get to enter the (usually very small number of) external
records
> > so
> > you retain complete control of the actual zone data.
> >
> > > 1) Add a Primary Forward Zone in DNS manager using "mydomain.com"
> > > 2) Add host records pointing to public IP addresses that I choose to
use
> > for
> > > mail.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com
> > > 3) Add an MX record pointing to mail.mydomain.com
> >
> > Maybe not.  SBC will have the REVERSE and you need to find out
> > what (or ask them to set the) name they will use for you IP addresses in
> > the reverse zone.
> >
> > What REVERSE will you Email servers IP use?  That's where the MX for
> > mydomain.com needs to point --> might be mail.mydomain.com or it might
> > be something like SBC17824.mydomain.com or it might even be:
> > dsl-200.10.5.1.sbc.com (or some other combo.)
> >
> >
> > > 4) Change my default recipient policy to reflect the "mydomain.com"
> > address
> > > for SMTP
> >
> > Yes, but you are back to exchange stuff again. (Not pure DNS.)
> >
> >
> > > Am I on the right track here?  I have a couple of weeks before my DSL
is
> > in
> > > place, so I can go so far as to start over from scratch if necessary.
I
> > > just want to make sure I get it right.  If I need to step back and
start
> > > over, I will have the following items at my disposal:
> >
> > Figure out the IP they will give you.  Get the OWNER of the IP (SBC) to
> > create the reverse record using EITHER their "standard pattern" or your
> > desired name -- which is largely irrelevant, but you must KNOW that
> > name.
> >
> > This is the name you TELL you SMTP server to "act as".  When it contacts
> > another SMTP server for SENDING email it will report this name, while
the
> > IP address part of the send/receive headers in the packet.  The
recipient
> > email server will (typically) try to confirm you are who you say you are
> by
> > doing a "reverse on the IP" to determine it is WHO you claimed to be.
> >
> > Note this has NOTHING (or almost nothing) to do with receiving email.
> > A single such email server might receive email for dozens or even
hundreds
> > of clients domains/zones, but it can only claim to be one machine in one
> of
> > those zones -- or even in an unrelated zone.
> >
> > > - (1) Cayman 3546 DSL Modem/Router (I plan on using NAT)
> > > - (1) HP NetServer LC II Server (I can use multiple NICs if necessary)
> > > - (1) D-Link DI-614+ Wireless Router (what I'm currently using for my
> > cable
> > > modem)
> > > - (1) MSDN Universal Subscription
> > >
> > > If I'm not already on the right path, can someone provide some
guidance?
> >
> > You are confusing receiving email with sending it.
> >
> > -- 
> > Herb Martin
> > "Kyle Burns" <kburns@REMOVE.NOSPAM.humana.com> wrote in message
> > news:uhVSA0TBEHA.2476@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > I originally posted this inquiry on the Exchange connectivity
newsgroup,
> > but
> > > in retrospect this is probably a much more appropriate forum so I
> > apologize
> > > in advance to those who subscribe to both for the cross post (post to
> > > microsoft.public.exchange2000.connectivity follows):
> > >
> > >
> > > I came here looking for the answer to basically the same question and,
> > after
> > > reading the linked article, still do not have a complete picture of
what
> I
> > > need to do.  I've decided to try my hand at hosting my own mail
services
> > at
> > > home and am not sure if I'm completely on the right track.  To date,
> I've
> > > done the following:
> > >
> > > 1) Installed Windows 2000 Server and configured it as an Active
> Directory
> > DC
> > > for "mydomain.local"
> > > 2) Installed Exchange 2000
> > > 3) Placed my order for DSL service with 5 static IP addresses
> > >
> > > I've been told by SBC that I will be managing my own DNS.  I'm
familiar
> > with
> > > creating records in DNS, but am not 100% sure of what I have to
> initially
> > do
> > > as the source of the records.  I _think_ that what I have left to do
is:
> > >
> > > 1) Add a Primary Forward Zone in DNS manager using "mydomain.com"
> > > 2) Add host records pointing to public IP addresses that I choose to
use
> > for
> > > mail.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com
> > > 3) Add an MX record pointing to mail.mydomain.com
> > > 4) Change my default recipient policy to reflect the "mydomain.com"
> > address
> > > for SMTP
> > >
> > > Am I on the right track here?  I have a couple of weeks before my DSL
is
> > in
> > > place, so I can go so far as to start over from scratch if necessary.
I
> > > just want to make sure I get it right.  If I need to step back and
start
> > > over, I will have the following items at my disposal:
> > >
> > > - (1) Cayman 3546 DSL Modem/Router (I plan on using NAT)
> > > - (1) HP NetServer LC II Server (I can use multiple NICs if necessary)
> > > - (1) D-Link DI-614+ Wireless Router (what I'm currently using for my
> > cable
> > > modem)
> > > - (1) MSDN Universal Subscription
> > >
> > > If I'm not already on the right path, can someone provide some
guidance?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
> > > <lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote in
> > message
> > > news:%23p31uX7%23DHA.808@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > > See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF002.html - you can get rid
> of
> > > the
> > > > .local domain in your recipient policy if you wish, and use only the
> > true
> > > > .com domain - at the very least, you need to define the .com domain
as
> > the
> > > > primary/default reply domain.
> > > >
> > > > Mark Jansen wrote:
> > > > > Is there a way that the Exchange 2000 within a
> > > > > company.local domain be able to send and receive emails
> > > > > with a registered company.com domain? How could the DNS
> > > > > server with the company.local domain name be configured
> > > > > so it could function for Internet use, even if it is on
> > > > > company.local host name?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question about using .LOCAL and .COM
    ... solutions) manage the DNS and will use that service. ... >> I've been told by SBC that I will be managing my own DNS. ... SBC will have the REVERSE and you need to find out ... > A single such email server might receive email for dozens or even hundreds ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
  • Re: Is this right?
    ... > I did notice one thing which is odd in DNS. ... > both my forward and reverse zones have ... For forward zones this is not too bad. ... Herb Martin ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
  • Re: Usage Report show IP addr instead of computer names
    ... The reverse DNS look-up is only query DNS server, ... | the reverse lookups at 4:30, will that cause the Usage Report to identify ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: query regarding reverse IP
    ... Generally reverse DNS is governed by your ISP. ... and looking up the PTR record. ... Now when I am searching the other way it is YOUR DNS server that answers ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Scavenging question
    ... I think that "DCpromo cycling" mentioned by Herb means "Demote your DCs and ... If you have another DC, you can transfer FSMO to that DC, clean install the ... Clients recieve all DNS information via DHCP so in that way XP ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)