Re: SPAM Alert

• Previous message: Tim Robinson: "Re: SPAM Alert"
• In reply to: Al Dunbar: "Re: SPAM Alert"
• Next in thread: Todd Vargo: "Re: SPAM Alert"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:36:05 +1000

It's f*cking about you and your mate spamming. Stop it.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
'Not happy John! Defending our democracy',
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/29/1088392635123.html
"Al Dunbar" <alan-no-drub-spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:WVBMc.108887$ek5.45915@pd7tw2no...
> 
> "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:OWnUr3acEHA.2944@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >>You answer one question a day or so. I answer 100.
> >>You are a spammer. You should leave these groups too.
> 
> Well, we are all allowed to have our own opinions, and you are most
> certainly welcome to yours. I will leave it to others to come to their own
> conclusions about whether or not the net effect of my contributions to
> various groups (certainly less than your stellar 100 answers per day) is
> negative or positive, or whether or not I am a spammer (cite one example
> where I have directed somone to my own site for the purpose of selling
> anything).
> 
> >>You and your mate spam here. You are interfering with
> >>those who volunteer their time, which you don't. We've
> >>been through this before you piece of dog SH1T.
> 
> I have no "mate" on usenet - you seem to have succumbed to the notion that
> all of those that disagree with you are all in agreement on everything else.
> 
> Not sure how I am interfering with those who volunteer their time. In your
> case, for example, you could just as easily ignore my posts if this silly
> argument is taking up too much of your time.
> 
> As to the name-calling, I hope you are enjoying it, as it is not doing
> anything for or to me. As to wasting your time, my comments on the
> "professionalism" of swearing and not showing others respect was intended
> strictly as a suggestion I think you would benefit from. Apparently they
> fell on the deaf ears of someone who has difficulty with the idea of being
> objective. My fault for assuming you capable of rational discussion.
> 
> 
> /Al
> 
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 'Not happy John! Defending our democracy',
> http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/29/1088392635123.html
> 
> "Al Dunbar [MS-MVP]" <alan-no-drub-spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ukAESjacEHA.3040@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Another aspect of unprofessionalism is to assume that others own the
> > responsibility for your own behaviour.
> >
> > /Al
> >
> > "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> wrote in message
> > news:er4eiSacEHA.3792@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Complain to timo spammer.
> >
> > -- 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > 'Not happy John! Defending our democracy',
> > http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/29/1088392635123.html
> >
> > "Al Dunbar [MS-MVP]" <alan-no-drub-spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:eh0LZOacEHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > >
> > > "Si Ballenger" <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote in message
> > > news:41029889.306250785@news.comporium.net...
> > > > On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 03:01:08 +1000, "David Candy"
> > > > <david@mvps.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Look f*ckhead, just don't spam here. It's simple.
> > > >
> > > > This is totally unacceptable! Why is MS allowing MPVs like you to
> > > > use such vulger language in this MS controlled help room? Shame
> > > > on you and shame on MS for allowing this behavior!
> > >
> > > Seconded. Granted, MS has no control over what an MVP says or does here
> or
> > > anywhere else. Still, I would think that there are probably more than
> two
> > of
> > > us who see this as a poor example of professionalism, to say the least.
> > >
> > > /Al
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

• Previous message: Tim Robinson: "Re: SPAM Alert"
• In reply to: Al Dunbar: "Re: SPAM Alert"
• Next in thread: Todd Vargo: "Re: SPAM Alert"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]