Re: Domain Trusts

From: Cameron Dorrough (cdorrough_at_nortonconsultants.com)
Date: 12/03/04


Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:34:33 +1100


"Tomasz Onyszko" <T.Onyszko@w2k.pl> wrote in message
news:#t3VBP$1EHA.2112@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Dan wrote:
> > I am installing a new windows 2003 server domain and want to create a
trust
> > with a Small Busness Server 2000 Domain. Is this possible?
>
> I think that this is an violation of EULA so I will not post here any
> links but If You will use google ...

It has nothing to do with violating the EULA - it is just plain not possible
(I've tried).

Cameron:-)



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Im done with this thread - was: Alias acting like a troll
    ... >>provisions of US copyright law and that a court decision would be ... >>incumbent upon the licensor to sue the licensee in order to dispute ... >>an alleged violation of such an agreement? ... >>EULA himself, in the privacy of his own home? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: License key for home network
    ... > market. ... >> So you and MS can CLAIM that it is a violation of the EULA until you ... MS has just chosen not to take anybody to court - or they would ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: License key for home network
    ... Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote: ... It's not a violation of the EULA unless MS proves it in court, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Upload Windows XP in second computer
    ... time, as I have read the many and varied posts in these newsgroups about the eula and laws, the black/white characterizations about breaking a law because the eula is violated stand out. ... Well, there are admittedly some parts of the world that do not recognise the intellectual property and/or commercial contract laws of other countries, but, by and large, I think you'll find that violation of many EULAs does constitute a violation of the law, in many jurisdictions. ... They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Domain Trusts
    ... > Dan wrote: ... > I think that this is an violation of EULA so I will not post here any ... It has nothing to do with violating the EULA - it is just plain not possible ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)