Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: "Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]" <SubstituteThisWithMyFullNameSeparatedByDots@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 00:15:09 +0200
sorry...
is it a SP0 w2k3 CD
or
is it a SP1 w2k3 CD (SP1 slipstreamed)
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG (WEB-BASED)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"HbooGz" <hboogz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149717249.271199.51580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jorge --
The hotfix would apply only if i received the errors indicated or
through your experienced ? or should i apply it ?
I'm a bit confused, i have all win2k machines, and this hotfix would
adjust the adprep version, but how would i apply it if i don't have a
win2k3 machine and i'm running adprep directly from the cd
Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP] wrote:
ADPREP /FORESTPREP does the AD schema
ADPREP /DOMAINPREP does the AD domain itself
ADPREP /DOMAINPREP /GPPREP does the SYSVOL of the AD domain
you can find more info in:
using the link I gave you to the post I made or...
* MS-KBQ324392_Enhancements to Adprep.exe in Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 and in hotfix 324392 (http://support.microsoft.com/?id=324392)
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG (WEB-BASED)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)--> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"HbooGz" <hboogz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149708113.958100.270260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Jorge!
Looks like a great read.
quickly -- does adprep /domainprep /gpprep replace the need to run just
adprep /domainprep ?
I'm not sure what the gpprep does although i can guess it updates the
GPO archictecture from 2k to 2k3
Thanks,
Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP] wrote:
see:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2005/11/19/110.aspx
you only need R2 if you use its functionalities. And several
functionalities
might need a schema update
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"HbooGz" <hboogz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149706585.638043.99480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Im currently planning a migration from 2k to 2k3 --
two questions ?
is it worth on an active directory perspective, to go with r2 ? i
have
a medium environment with about 250 workstations and users.
i've never seen the switch adprep /domainprep /gpprep -- what is
that ?
do i run that instead of adprep /domainprep ?
Thanks,
Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP] wrote:
have you done ADPREP /FORESTPREP from CD2?
No? -> do it! ;-)
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/06/930.aspx
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory Services
BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers
no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"patman" <patman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3E32457C-3EC4-4887-9B06-B973DB25C690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hello Jorge,
thank you for your information.
unfortunatly i had already checked those points.
i preprared my AD 2000 and checked it successfully.
in fact when i try to promote a windows 2003 SP1 R2 from member
to
DCs
in my AD 2000 prepared with adprep, i get the following message:
"the AD's schema of the source forest is not compatible with the
AD's
version
of this computer" (meaning my windows 2003 server)
i don't see why because the preparation is fine..
the adprep/ domainprep is supposed to create new OU and objets (i
don't
know
which one and i didn't see any after the preparation).
could you tell me :
which objet and OU are supposed to be created ?
a different manner to check the preparation is fine ?
why i get the message of imcompatible version..(my 2 DC 2000 are
SP4)
thanks in advance for your answer..
--
Patrick.
"Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]" wrote:
try:
REPADMIN /REPLSUMMARY * /BYSRC /BYDEST /SORT:DELTA
also see:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/06/06/1094.aspx
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Windows Server - Directory
Services
BLOG --> http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and
confers
no
rights!
* Always test before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"patman" <patman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:49EECB4E-4A9D-4E68-B67A-C24DA0A0C979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hello,
i'm testing the migration of an AD 2000 to 2003.
i made adprep /forestprep --> ok
adprep /domainprep /gpprep --> ok (with cd 2003 R2)
normally i'm supposed beeing able to put an DC 2003 after
replication
have been done between all DC servers.
i have already checked in the ADSI editor the revision
parameters
written
in
the document q309628 (operation performed....)
My question is: i'd like to know how you can verify that
replication
has
been successful between DCs, meaning, what do i must check on
the
others
DCs to check that they are now prepared ?
some OU are supposed to be created but i don't see anything.
thanks for any help...
Patrick.
.
- References:
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: patman
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: HbooGz
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: HbooGz
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- From: HbooGz
- Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: Unknown Objects prevent replication
- Next by Date: Re: Re enabling KCC
- Previous by thread: Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- Next by thread: Re: migration AD 2000 to 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|