Re: DMZ webserver portal question
- From: "Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]" <cwshultz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:17:33 -0400
AD in the DMZ is 'generally' not a good idea. Key word is 'generally'.
--
Cary W. Shultz
Roanoke, VA 24012
WIN2000 Active Directory MVP
http://www.activedirectory-win2000.com
(soon to be updated!!!)
http://www.grouppolicy-win2000.com
(soon to be updated!!!)
"John" <dontmailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4344117c$0$10961$ba620e4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> We have several webservers with several web base applications (total
> compatible for internet explorer, FireFox or others) in our dmz and want
> to
> make an "single sign on" portal (also web based) application for our
> internet customers. The goal is that a user will log in into the web
> portal
> and only see and use dedicated web applications. These application can sit
> on other webserver. Also, If the user close his browser, and open a fresh
> browser he must be logged in into the application automatically and
> securely.
>
> We are looking into setting up active directory in the dmz. Is this a good
> practice our a nightmare? And can this fulfill all our needs?
>
> Kind regards,
> John
> Ierland.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DMZ webserver portal question
- From: Burtsev Dmitry
- Re: DMZ webserver portal question
- References:
- DMZ webserver portal question
- From: John
- DMZ webserver portal question
- Prev by Date: Re: 2003 server file rights
- Next by Date: Re: no authority could be contacted for authentication
- Previous by thread: DMZ webserver portal question
- Next by thread: Re: DMZ webserver portal question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|