Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: Enkidu <enkidu.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 18:14:43 +1200
Hi Bob,
Yes, I'll look for you. Yes, it does work by files. Specifically, a "passwd" and a "group" file.
You associate a Windows user (eg administrator) with a Unix user (eg root). You can associate a Windows group (eg administrators) with a Unix group, (eg root)
Please note, I am using SFU 3.0, but the principle is the same.
Cheers,
Cliff
BobMarley wrote:
If you can look monday? I don't understand actually HOW to map.. we don't use NIS... so i guess i need a file to do it?
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:42:08 +1200, Enkidu <enkidu.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, I have Windows Appliance servers running 2003 and SFU 3.0 and 2TB arrays. It comes with a web-based configuration utility. I'm not at work at present so I can't remember what the real name is. In there I map the Administrator and one other user to root user and similar for groups.
I guess another thing to check would be the NFS share permissions on the shared directories.
Cheers,
Cliff
BobMarley wrote:
i can't figure out how to do that. have you done it?
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:00:10 +1200, Enkidu <enkidu.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't do mapping? You *have* to map at least one user or group, don't you, to determine who has access to the files. I guess you could map the Everyone group to the root user.
Cheers,
Clifff
BobMarley wrote:
We don't do mapping. i seem to remember never having to do it before... I was wondering if this was a new security feature in 3.0 or 3.5
what i'd love to do is have the file created by the unix host, be available as EVERYONE with full control.
any idea how i can do that?
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:23:06 +1200, Enkidu <enkidu.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
BobMarley wrote:
I have a unix server connecting to an NFS mount point on my Windows Server. Whenever a file is written there by the unix server, it typically comes across as having permissions only of SYSTEM and read. So no one is ever able to access the file
How can i have it come across so that it is a file readable by Windows users? I thought it did that by default in earlier versions, but maybe 3.5 changed that?
We use SFU 3.0 and it a major pain in the ... neck! When you add a file or change permissions on the Unix it creates a new Windows ACL. This means that all users/groups with permissions on that directory and the files in it become inaccessible on the Windows for almost all users. The new acl seems to wipe all existing acls and since it is theoretically inherited (don't know why) all you see in the permissions is grey blank boxes which you can't change.
What we have to do periodically is take ownership of the directory and all sub-directories and files and set the permissions back again.
Though having said that, have you checked the mapping between Windows users and groups and Unix users and groups?
--
Barzoomian the Martian - http://barzoomian.blogspot.com .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: BobMarley
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- References:
- SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: BobMarley
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: Enkidu
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: BobMarley
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: Enkidu
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: BobMarley
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: Enkidu
- Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- From: BobMarley
- SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- Prev by Date: Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- Next by Date: Re: AD is not writing required DNS records to DNS
- Previous by thread: Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- Next by thread: Re: SFU3.5 and getting permissions to work
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|