Re: RAID and NTFS Question
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.lan)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Harald Bilke: "Force AD replication w/repadmin"
- Previous message: Nils M. Lunde: "Re: service principal name for the VMRC server could not be regist"
- Maybe in reply to: john_20_28_2000_at_yahoo.com: "Re: RAID and NTFS Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:03:10 GMT
In article <1106667543.467926.259230@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
john_20_28_2000@yahoo.com says...
> But why would Windows 2000 not "understand" what happened and just
> function as normal? I thought it wouldn't know anything about the
> RAID, since it is hardware, but that it simply accesses them. That it
> would care how many drives I had, just that the data was accessible.
> Instead, when Win2k booted, it started talking about inconsistencies
> and moved the files into the dir.000x files.
As I said yesterday, you have two problem - one is the fault the other
was corruption.
-- -- spamfree999@rrohio.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Harald Bilke: "Force AD replication w/repadmin"
- Previous message: Nils M. Lunde: "Re: service principal name for the VMRC server could not be regist"
- Maybe in reply to: john_20_28_2000_at_yahoo.com: "Re: RAID and NTFS Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
