Re: branch office administrator

From: Joe Richards [MVP] (humorexpress_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/17/05


Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:42:20 -0500

Honestly, I would yank the DC out of that site. You are in a dangerous position.
If you give this person any local admin type accesses (ability to log on
locally, ability to mess with services, ability to write to the file system,
etc) to the DC he has immense power to hurt you. If you don't give him access he
can compromise the DC because he has physical access to it. The reasons behind
it can be to show that you guys shouldn't be running the stuff. It sounds a
little cynical but I have had people contact me with similar issues previously,
that crap happens.

You can not secure against this person. Former should mean, he isn't anywhere
near the location.

   joe

--
Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services
www.joeware.net
Brian Higgins wrote:
> I have a client that has 25 branch locations. we are in the process of 
> upgrading and bringing nearly all of these online and setup under one domain 
> (DC/GC housed at each office with separate sites defined for each physical 
> location with some sort of high speed connection between 384 Kb/s and 3.0 
> Mb/s at each location with a VPN link back to corporate). Most of the sites 
> only have between 5-15 users.
> 
> The plant manager is complaining at one location that was brought online 
> this last week, because the former "IT Guy" that took care of their 
> equipment is a friend of his and he doesn't want him to stop doing their 
> work. We work for the corporate office so he doesn't have much choice/say 
> over most of this, but he has managed to get corporate to give him 
> permission to give full administrative rights over the computers and server 
> at the location to his buddy the "IT Guy"
> 
> As I said, the server is a DC and GC (2003 native mode) so I can't justgive 
> him local admin rights to the server.
> 
> What is the best way to give him administrative control over the server, and 
> user accounts/computer accounts, without compromising security on the rest 
> of the network? (all objects in AD that pertain to the location are housed 
> in or under a OU, except for the Server which is obviously in the Domain 
> Controllers OU, I have already ran the delegate permission wizard in AD for 
> that OU.)??
> 
> Thanks in advance...
> 
> Brian 
> 
> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Changing toolbar config in Normal
    ... We have no ability to Cancel posts on this server. ... I am addressing these groups through the NNTP "Network News Transport ... McGhie Information Engineering Pty Ltd ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: SBS 2003 and that pesky Windows XP SP2 Firewall...
    ... > You just disable the group policy at the server...but ... > if they are local admin they WILL have the ability to change the settings. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Proper method to allow "user" to login to server 2003 via TS?
    ... I was trying to configure a local user (not admin or power user) with ... I don't want to give this user the ability ... to do anything other than start/stop a service on the server ... Administrator ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Client Lockdown
    ... I was hoping that someone could shed some light on a configuration issue I am ... Deny their ability to install their own programs ... I purchased the SBS Premium to get the ISA server 2000. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: [SLE] Alert
    ... The owner still has the ability to share their files to whomever they ... Many places use linux as a server with many 100's of people having ... From a server stand point this is a no-no. ... How many people keep personal files in their home dir, ...
    (SuSE)