Re: XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 WS do
From: Herb Martin (news_at_LearnQuick.com)
Date: 01/14/05
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: Switching to native mode, when to, scared!"
- Previous message: Herb Martin: "Re: Changing password expiring notification duration"
- In reply to: bbuchen: "XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 WS do"
- Next in thread: bbuchen: "Re: XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 W"
- Reply: bbuchen: "Re: XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 W"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:54:06 -0600
"bbuchen" <bbuchen@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:24BE27F6-DD98-4C2D-B1CB-9F81CB88424A@microsoft.com...
> Hello,
>
> I have setup an OU with a GPO that will install Outlook 2003 by Computer.
> This works great for win 2000 workstations but for any XP ws
(Professional)
> I get the error upon boot up that it could not contact the DC therefore
the
> GPO install will abort. Any ideas? I suspected a problem with DNS
> but I have check it and seems fine. I am able to log into the WS with a
AD
> user and
Such (failure to authenticate and thus load GPOs etc.) is almost
always a DNS issue but it can be a more direct authentication or
permission problem.
> I am able to ping, nslookup all systems on the network including the DC
> without any problems.
This does argue for eliminating DNS as the culprit,
but let's first say that INTERNAL clients must use
ONLY the internal DNS servers in their NIC->IP->
DNS server properties.
How about permissions? Are the install files (the MSI etc.)
located on a server with Share or NTFS permissions that
do not allow the XP machines (accounts) to download the
files?
If you used something like "Authenticated Users-READ" this
should not be the problem.
Does it really say it "cannot contact the DC" or does it use
the Server name (for the DC) in the context of trying to
download the FILES?
There is a difference (the DC doesn't actually have to hold
the files distributed through the GPO instructions, but the
key here is to isolate WHAT is failing.)
It sounds like permissions but that seems unlikely to be
messed up.
-- Herb Martin >
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: Switching to native mode, when to, scared!"
- Previous message: Herb Martin: "Re: Changing password expiring notification duration"
- In reply to: bbuchen: "XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 WS do"
- Next in thread: bbuchen: "Re: XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 W"
- Reply: bbuchen: "Re: XP workstations will not apply GPO software install but 2000 W"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|