Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions
From: panther3 (panther3_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/04/05
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: Does Every Site Have to have a DC?"
- Previous message: panther3: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- In reply to: Jimmy Andersson [MVP]: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- Next in thread: Chriss3 [MVP]: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- Reply: Chriss3 [MVP]: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 04:39:06 -0800
we are not so concenred with performance at this stage just putting together
a recommend dc spec for our sites, we have two pysical scsi disks and raid1,
I think we will go with a c: partition of 7-10GB and the remainder of the
disk approx 20GB to d: with sysvol moved to d:
"Jimmy Andersson [MVP]" wrote:
> If you thinking about Perf gains you won't get anything useful unless you
> have separate spindles.
>
> Regards,
> /Jimmy
> --
> Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB
> Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> ---------- www.qadvice.com ----------
>
>
> "panther3" <panther3@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:D9B5BF8E-1684-47F0-AAA4-847DF4525641@microsoft.com...
> > Is there any need to have more than one disk partition for a domain
> > controller, ie: should we use the entire disk as c: or should we have a c:
> > and d: partition? thanks in advance
>
>
>
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: Does Every Site Have to have a DC?"
- Previous message: panther3: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- In reply to: Jimmy Andersson [MVP]: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- Next in thread: Chriss3 [MVP]: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- Reply: Chriss3 [MVP]: "Re: Domain Controller Disk Partitions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
