Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gradually migrate from Win2000 to Win200
From: lforbes (UseLinkToEmail_at_WindowsForumz.com)
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: Brian Desmond [MVP]: "Re: Change logon hours for all users in Active Directory"
- Previous message: Desmond Lee: "Re: DNS AD Integrated and How many DC's to serve about 15,000 user"
- In reply to: Herb Martin: "Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gradually migrate from Win2000 to Win2003 AD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Jan 2005 18:16:37 -0500
Hi,
> Why ever would you transfer the discussion to "pre-set". The
question
> under discussion is do they have a use for some people some of the
> time -- the answer is clearly yes, as even you have convinced
yourself
> and written once you thought it through.
I am not saying Microsoft should do away with having Share
Permissions. I agree, they are useful for others maybe more than
myself. However, I am just saying they caused a lot less trouble when
they weren’t defaulted to "read only" for everyone. When they were
"everyone = full control" then they didn’t mess with access of
administrators, users to their home folders etc.
For example, I have 2500 Users. I create hundreds of shares for users
home directories, applications that need shared directories, group
shared directories . Now everytime I create a share, I have to
manually remember to go in and change the share permissions back to
Full Control. As my NTFS permissions are inherited they are created
automatically when the folder is created. If I forget the share
permissions, then the application doesn’t work, etc and I have to come
in on my day off to reset the share permissions.
Microsoft made such a big deal about "secure out of the box" with
Windows 2003. I think that was a great idea, but in this one case they
went a little overboard.
Security is a good thing but not letting users access their own home
directories or their profiles by default is just a little over the
top.
Cheers,
Lara
-- http://www.WindowsForumz.com/ This article was posted by author's request Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards Topic URL: http://www.WindowsForumz.com/Active-Directory-Gradually-migrate-Win2000-Win2003-AD-ftopict242271.html Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.WindowsForumz.com/eform.php?p=745087
- Next message: Brian Desmond [MVP]: "Re: Change logon hours for all users in Active Directory"
- Previous message: Desmond Lee: "Re: DNS AD Integrated and How many DC's to serve about 15,000 user"
- In reply to: Herb Martin: "Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gradually migrate from Win2000 to Win2003 AD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|