Re: Logins fail if one DC unavailable

From: Enkidu (enkidu_at_xyzcliffpxyz.com)
Date: 12/09/04

  • Next message: Enkidu: "Re: HELP!! Maximum number of domains in a forest"
    Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:17:07 +1300
    
    

    If all DCs are also GCs, this is NOT a problem.

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346

    I'm a little surprised that no one has pointed this out.

    Cheers,

    Cliff

    On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:15:05 -0800, DaveinPNG
    <DaveinPNG@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

    >This was the answer. Once I made DC2 (in the same domain as DC1) and DC3 (in
    >a child domain) all GC servers, all three can now handle logins.
    >
    >Considering what I have, should I be concerned that DC1 and DC3 are a GC and
    >the Infrastruture master? I really have no choice, do I?
    >
    >Thanks.
    >
    >Dave
    >
    >"Ken B" wrote:
    >
    >> One other thing to check... are DC's 2 & 3 Global Catalogs? That's what
    >> really handles authentication, I believe.
    >>
    >> Ken
    >>
    >>
    >> "Herb Martin" <news@LearnQuick.com> wrote in message
    >> news:OXHKM0E3EHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
    >> > "DaveinPNG" <DaveinPNG@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    >> > news:DF8FB2C2-BA9A-4663-9F71-4278EF888DA1@microsoft.com...
    >> >> Two domains - Two DCs in one domain, one DC in a child domain
    >> >>
    >> >> If DC1 is unavailable, even though DC2 and DC3 are available, no one can
    >> >> login.
    >> >> REPADMIN /showreps looks fine.
    >> >
    >> > Ok, that eliminates replication but the most common
    >> > reason is that one of the DCs is not registered properly
    >> > in DNS OR your DNS is only correct on the other (missing)
    >> > DC.
    >> >
    >> > Most replication and authentication problems are based on
    >> > DNS problems.
    >> >
    >> >> The only clue I can find is this: I was writing a perl script to
    >> > authenicate
    >> >> a user. The bind fails no matter what I do.
    >> >> I get a similiar message if I run repadmin /bind DSA:
    >> >> DsBindWithCred to dsa failed with status 1722 (0x6ba):
    >> >> The RPC server is unavailable.
    >> >
    >> > This might be important and represent some serious problem
    >> > with the (other) DC, but let's do the obvious first.
    >> >
    >> >> I know this has got to be simple, but I'm stumped.
    >> >> BTW: DC1 has all of the roles and was upgraded from NT4 (PDC) to W2K to
    >> > W2K3.
    >> >
    >> > Pretty much irrelevant as long are you clients are Win2000+
    >> > and you aren't discussing BDCs.
    >> >
    >> > Roles can affect clients but seldom in authentication (e.g.,
    >> > browsing) unless the client is Win9x or NT, and thus
    >> > (could be) dependent on the PDC emulator.
    >> >
    >> > First, run DCDiag on the problematic DC -- and save the
    >> > output to a text file (/?) -- search the file for FAIL, ERROR,
    >> > WARN and either fix those errors or report them (here).
    >> >
    >> > Check you DNS architecture:
    >> >
    >> > DNS
    >> > 1) Dynamic for the zone supporting AD
    >> > 2) All internal DNS clients NIC\IP properties must specify SOLELY
    >> > that internal, dynamic DNS server (set.)
    >> > 3) DCs and even DNS servers are DNS clients too -- see #2
    >> >
    >> > Restart NetLogon on any DC if you change any of the above that
    >> > affects a DC.
    >> >
    >> > Ensure that DNS zones/domains are fully replicated to all DNS
    >> > servers for that (internal) zone/domain.
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > --
    >> > Herb Martin
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >>

    -- 
    These twin-CPU hyperthreading computers are really
    great! We can wait ten to a hundred times faster
    these days.
    

  • Next message: Enkidu: "Re: HELP!! Maximum number of domains in a forest"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Backup plan and upgrading procedures
      ... If w2k GCs exist and the PAS is ... w2k3 GCs only do partial rebuild. ... have w2k3 dcs because it changes the partial attribute set. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: Windows Domain Setup - FSMO Roles and DNS - Best, secure setup
      ... Making all of them GCs is important though. ... DCs setup in the same way also simplifies DR and support. ... I increase the priority on all DCs and keep it lowest on the PDCe. ... Nothing wrong with that as long as your DNS servers forward to the firewall ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: Global Catalog Failure
      ... network still functions close to normal. ... You should NOT make every DC a GC in a LARGE forest, ... You should have a MINIMUM of two GCs per site for fault tolerance. ... But with small forests you can just make all DCs GCs and get ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
    • Re: GC and Operations Master on same
      ... The IM is a domain role, ... if all DCs in any given domain are GCs then it doesn't matter. ... you have to weigh up the cost or replication against ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: Global Catalog Failure
      ... You should NOT make every DC a GC in a LARGE forest, ... but you have indicated this is not the case for your network. ... You should have a MINIMUM of two GCs per site for fault tolerance. ... But with small forests you can just make all DCs GCs and get ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)