Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD
From: Joe Richards [MVP] (humorexpress_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Order of Scripts running in OU's"
- Previous message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Role of Global catlog in single domain in LAN"
- In reply to: Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]: "Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD"
- Next in thread: Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]: "Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD"
- Reply: Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]: "Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:46:09 -0400
Let me correct that URL... www.joeware.net
if you want you can read about it in the current Windows IT Pro magazine. It is
one of 5 Best Tools for AD (I have 2 other tools in that list as well).
joe
-- Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services www.joeware.net Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP] wrote: > Mutsa, > > A large part of the problem apparently is that the domain user account > object is a member of the computer's local Administrators group. I suggest > this as the only way that this action ( to rename a computer or to join it > to a domain/workgroup ) is available is if the domain user account object is > a member of the local Administrators group ( or that the domain user account > object being used to do this is a member of the Domain Admins or other 'top > level' special groups ). > > A 'regular' domain user account object *should* not be a member of any of > these groups. This problem very quickly goes away if this basic security > policy is maintained and enforced ( as the ability to do this is not > available ). > > There is also the behavioral problem ( which, again, would not be possible > where basic security policies in place - but I do understand that this is > not always possible politically. Which is always a horrible horrible > horrible reason). Management and HR might need to be involved and your user > base needs to be made aware that they are not to be messing with the > computer account objects in any way, shape or form. However, this requires > HR and Management to be in agreement with the IT Department's stance on > this. This is not always the case ( as mentioned above ) so...... > > Now, while this is not an 'automagic' approach you can go to Joe Richard's > website at http://www.joesware.net and look at his free utilities section. > There is something called oldcmp that will do what you need. However, you > do need to manually run this ( or set up something so that it runs on a > schedule ). Be advised that you must first disable any computer account > objects before you can delete them. This is just one of the several > safeguards that Joe wisely built in to this awesome utility. > > HTH, > > Cary > > "mutsa" <mutsa@roke.co.uk> wrote in message > news:%232w2u$3rEHA.2168@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > >>Does any one know if there is an automatic way to scavenge and delete the >>accounts of machines that have been taken permanently off-line but have > > not > >>been cleanly removed from the domain. >> >>For example a machine is built using RIS which will automatically add that >>client to AD. After that the user removes the machine from the network to >>make it stand-alone, but does not inform me. I would like that machines >>account to be either deleted automatically from AD after a set period of >>time of say 60 days or disabled somehow. >> >>Is this possible and can anyone help. >> >>MMMSD >> >> > > >
- Next message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Order of Scripts running in OU's"
- Previous message: Joe Richards [MVP]: "Re: Role of Global catlog in single domain in LAN"
- In reply to: Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]: "Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD"
- Next in thread: Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]: "Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD"
- Reply: Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP]: "Re: Scavenging Machine Acounts in AD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|