Re: Restricted Groups
From: Steven L Umbach (n9rou_at_n0-spam-for-me-comcast.net)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: policy to define the local Administrator rights on clients"
- Previous message: MgtyMike: "RE: Client Has BIG Domain Mess... NT/2000 Conflict"
- In reply to: Srinivas Acharya: "Restricted Groups"
- Next in thread: ptwilliams: "Re: Restricted Groups"
- Reply: ptwilliams: "Re: Restricted Groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:03:12 GMT
Not all security policy settings are removed when a computer is remove form the scope
of the policy. Restricted groups is one of them, and file/registry permissions is
another. Settings under administrative templates are usually changed to reflect the
Local Group Policy setting if the new location has an undefined setting in the
PO. --- Steve
"Srinivas Acharya" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1b9201c46fad$7960d130$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have added the domain user to local administrator group
> of all the PCs coming under one OU with the help of
> restricted groups. but now I have moved that PC from that
> OU. But still that user is in the administrator group of
> those PCs. Why still that user is having admin previleges
> even though that user is no more in that OU. Please any of
> you could address this issue?.
> Regards,
> Srinivas Acharya
- Next message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: policy to define the local Administrator rights on clients"
- Previous message: MgtyMike: "RE: Client Has BIG Domain Mess... NT/2000 Conflict"
- In reply to: Srinivas Acharya: "Restricted Groups"
- Next in thread: ptwilliams: "Re: Restricted Groups"
- Reply: ptwilliams: "Re: Restricted Groups"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
