Re: huge user OU

From: Simon Geary (simon_geary_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/08/04


Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:53:01 +0100

As a rule of thumb there are two reasons to divide your users into different
OU's. If they will have different Group Policies applied; and if you will
use delegation of administration to allow different users to administer the
accounts.
In your case, if all users will be given the same Group Policies and the
same admins will be responsible for the accounts then there is no problem
having that many users in one OU, although searches will take a little
longer.
The less OU's the better, in my opinion, as it keeps things simple. I don't
think large numbers alone would justify creating more than one OU.

"Jeff Senter" <jsenter@erols.com> wrote in message
news:OgjsOlVTEHA.760@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I do some consulting for an University and they are planing on haveing
> all of the users in one large OU. The plan on breaking the machines up
> in to smaller OU. THey belive that thay can manage this thoug GPO
> easily with this configuration. SOme thing tells me this is not going
> to work well but I can not put my finger on it. Or am I wrong am this
> configuration will work just fine.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: huge user OU
    ... use delegation of administration to allow different users to administer the ... if all users will be given the same Group Policies and the ... same admins will be responsible for the accounts then there is no problem ... configuration will work just fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: huge user OU
    ... they are plaing on have around 100 to 150 people with admin ... use delegation of administration to allow different users to administer the ... same admins will be responsible for the accounts then there is no problem ... configuration will work just fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: huge user OU
    ... admin rights and somewere between 25 and 200 machine OU that they can ... If they will have different Group Policies applied; ... >use delegation of administration to allow different users to administer the ... >>configuration will work just fine. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: Logging out of Remote desktop
    ... Look at the group policies on the machine to make sure they are configured to disconnect/log off RD ... Navigate to the "Local Computer Policy -> Computer Configuration -> Administrative ... > In our office we use remote desktop extensively however occasionally someone logs out and a ... > subsequent user goes to log in and they get a message stating that the last person is still logged ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
  • Re: RDC Disconnects After 10 mins
    ... Look at the group policies on the machine to make sure they are not configured to disconnect/log off ... Navigate to the "Local Computer Policy -> Computer Configuration -> Administrative ... Do this on the RDP host. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)