Re: huge user OU
From: Simon Geary (simon_geary_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/08/04
- Next message: Steve: "How to Determine Cause of Slow DC/GC Performance?"
- Previous message: Simon Geary: "Re: Applemac in an AD envorment?"
- In reply to: Jeff Senter: "huge user OU"
- Next in thread: Jeff Senter: "Re: huge user OU"
- Reply: Jeff Senter: "Re: huge user OU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:53:01 +0100
As a rule of thumb there are two reasons to divide your users into different
OU's. If they will have different Group Policies applied; and if you will
use delegation of administration to allow different users to administer the
accounts.
In your case, if all users will be given the same Group Policies and the
same admins will be responsible for the accounts then there is no problem
having that many users in one OU, although searches will take a little
longer.
The less OU's the better, in my opinion, as it keeps things simple. I don't
think large numbers alone would justify creating more than one OU.
"Jeff Senter" <jsenter@erols.com> wrote in message
news:OgjsOlVTEHA.760@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I do some consulting for an University and they are planing on haveing
> all of the users in one large OU. The plan on breaking the machines up
> in to smaller OU. THey belive that thay can manage this thoug GPO
> easily with this configuration. SOme thing tells me this is not going
> to work well but I can not put my finger on it. Or am I wrong am this
> configuration will work just fine.
>
- Next message: Steve: "How to Determine Cause of Slow DC/GC Performance?"
- Previous message: Simon Geary: "Re: Applemac in an AD envorment?"
- In reply to: Jeff Senter: "huge user OU"
- Next in thread: Jeff Senter: "Re: huge user OU"
- Reply: Jeff Senter: "Re: huge user OU"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|