Re: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- From: "Axel Dahmen" <NO_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:12:28 +0100
Well, I tend to believe that if you are working in a small company your
projects won't be this big to require you to do architect or testing.
UML is just a means of communicating workflow throughout the team without
the necessity to explain it personally in your words. If you can address
your staff personally, you most probably won't need UML. ... And if your
projects *really* grow that big that you'll need to test for load stress and
have others test your code for you then you will definitively have the money
in your pocket to spend it on another version of DevStudio.
My 2 cents...
Axel Dahmen
-----------
"Dushan Bilbija" <dbilbija@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23w5$p946FHA.1416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> i'm not sure the whole "let's divide this up by roles" idea is good.... if
> you're a small business, chances are you play multiple roles. so now you
> have to buy multiple versions or shell out $$$$$ for the suite. how is
that
> helpful for developers?
>
> not very good. am i the only one thinking this?
>
> dushan bilbija
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- From: Dushan Bilbija
- Re: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- From: BobF
- Re: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- References:
- what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- From: Dushan Bilbija
- what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- Prev by Date: VS2005 Team System & VSS2005 good? I don't think so.
- Next by Date: Re: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- Previous by thread: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- Next by thread: Re: what if you're an architect AND a developer?!?!?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|