VC++2005 is very slow compare to VC++2003

Any one realize that the new VC++ 2005 is very slow (compile, normal IDE editing, compiled code runs slower and exe size is larger) compare to VC++ 2003, I was quite excited when I switched the 2003 to 2005 last night, but now I am regret that I uninstalled my VC++ 2003 and plan to reinstall back tonight :'(
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: exe file
    ... "Train my users"? ... An EXE, ... than a VBS script at doing just about anything. ... to convey the general difference between compiled code ...
    (microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript)
  • Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)
    ... but the last time I checked it was due to the code generation ... I think thats around factor 2-4 slower. ... Especially without having CPUTYPE>=ev56 set. ... In fact te factor varies much around machine types, compiled code, ...
    (freebsd-performance)
  • Re: Signal 4 installing kernel/world built for different cputype
    ... > I use a build machine to build world and kernels for other, slower ... You need to set your CPUTYPE to the lowest ... common denominator of CPUs which you want the compiled code to run on. ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: MCRinstaller.exe backward compatibility!
    ... I have a compiled code from an older version of matlab ... access to 2007b's installer file? ... the exe was generated. ... The MCR comes with a unique ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)
  • Re: EXE is Slower than M-File
    ... I've compiled 10's of other functions I've written in Matlab with speed being equal to or faster than original m-code. ... What type of things do I need to look at to speed up the EXE? ... Why do you expect that compiled code is faster than native matlab code in the first place? ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)