Re: Remote Components for VS6, VS.NET 2002 & VS.NET 2003 on Windows 2003 Server

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: StringFellow Hawk (Star_Fleet_Admiral_Q(NOSPAM)_at_(SPAMNOT)hotmail.com)
Date: 10/26/04

  • Next message: Roman Spanner: "Re: Remote Components for VS6, VS.NET 2002 & VS.NET 2003 on Windows 2003 Server" 
    Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:51:22 -0400

    Well, we have all 3 installed, since we still are supporting, developing in
    all 3. 

    -- 
StringFellow Hawk
"Dom, give me turbos"
"Roman Spanner" <romanspanner@nospamplease.yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:e6SGU4tuEHA.2684@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Philip Street wrote:
>> My development team are moving our development projects to a new server, 
>> from Windows NT4 & Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 Server. We have a number 
>> of VS6 and VS.NET 2002 web projects that we need to support on the new 
>> server, as well as developing new VS.NET 2003 web projects.
>>
>> The question is this.
>>
>> Do we need to install the Visual Interdev Server (VS6) as well as the 
>> VS.NET 2002 Remote Components on our new server, as well as the VS.NET 
>> 2003 Remote Components, such that we continue to support/develop web 
>> projects created using all three development? Or can we get away with 
>> just installing the VS.NET 2003 Remote Components?
>>
>> Additionally, is anyone away of any problems running all three server 
>> components on the same Windows 2003 Server?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>>
>> Phil
>
> Is there anyone out there that knows the answer to this? Or is it just an 
> obvious question, the answer to which is in the original post, i.e. yes, 
> you do need to install all three in order they were released?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
  • Next message: Roman Spanner: "Re: Remote Components for VS6, VS.NET 2002 & VS.NET 2003 on Windows 2003 Server"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: XP pro
      ... anyone asking if they should install it should stop supporting their own ... use Win98 thru XP Pro, with very few customers that have servers. ... If the software will install on Windows XP Pro (acting as a server for a ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: TS WEB ACCESS 2008 - ActiveX control not installed or not enabled
      ... I have no problem with a new OS not supporting old technology, ... server OS to not support the dominant client OS is ridiculous. ... Windows Server 2008 RC0 ... Please don't tell me that I have to install SP3 as that is not ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
    • Re: forced reboot after automatic update download
      ... you must be supporting what maybe 10 - 50 servers??? ... reducing the number of man hours required each month for these updates. ... > What we're proposing, if I can presume to 2nd guess the OP, is that server ... >> you choose when to install them. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: New Event Log Errors!
      ... Somehow along those lines I'd also installed the Certificate Authority ... Did you apply the last Server Pack for SBS Server? ... Please install Windows Support Tools on the win2k3 sp1 problematic ... Microsoft is providing this information only as a convenience to you: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
      ... everywhere and sitting on the case of the server is the old board - balanced ... slip stream SBS you would have had it ages ago. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get ... updates that need to be applied if one is to have a succesful outcome ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)