Re: minimum processor power
From: Peter van der Goes (p_vandergoes_at_toadstool.u)
Date: 07/19/04
- Previous message: Thiago Campos Pereira: "Re: Registry entry for installation path"
- In reply to: David Lee: "Re: minimum processor power"
- Next in thread: Mark Smith [MSFT]: "Re: minimum processor power"
- Reply: Mark Smith [MSFT]: "Re: minimum processor power"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:31:17 -0500
"David Lee" <dack350c@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:MfSKc.3983$iK.1803@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Thanks. I cannot afford a 2ghz processor.Are you saying 1ghz won't do the
> job?
No, I'm not saying that a slower CPU won't do the job. I believe minimums
provided by Microsoft and Oracle are in the 7 - 800 MHz range. However, from
your original post I got the impression that you will have Oracle 9i and
VS.NET running at the same time, and that ups the ante on hardware
resources.
As I said previously, the amount of memory, is *far* more important than an
extra 200 - 300 MHz on your CPU.
In my humble opinion, you can get away with a CPU in the 1 - 2 GHz range
*if* you have adequate memory.
If you get less than 512 Meg of memory, you'll have to be *very* patient.
-- Peter [MVP Visual Developer] Jack of all trades, master of none.
- Previous message: Thiago Campos Pereira: "Re: Registry entry for installation path"
- In reply to: David Lee: "Re: minimum processor power"
- Next in thread: Mark Smith [MSFT]: "Re: minimum processor power"
- Reply: Mark Smith [MSFT]: "Re: minimum processor power"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|