Visual Studio .NET 2003 starts up slowly

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: MrDoomMaster (rdailey_at_gawab.com)
Date: 06/30/04


Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:31:39 -0500

First, let me start by explaining the events that lead up to my problem.

(My OS is Windows XP Professional)

I previously had DirectX 8.1 SDK installed on my system, and even though I
went to Add/Remove programs to uninstall it, it would say it was successful
at uninstalling it, but nothing was actually removed. This forced me to
manually delete the DXSDK folder, search the registry for keys related to
the installation, delete them, and also remove the Direct X .cpl file (which
supplied configuration from Control Panel)

After this, I installed the directx 9.0 SDK, which I planned to keep. I
noticed that after installing this, visual studio .NET always took about 20
seconds to load. The HDD light on my case was always lit during the startup
of Visual Studio, so I knew it had to have been loading help files every
time it started.

I have currently uninstalled all signs of any DirectX sdk (or so I hope).
Now, it STILL loads up slowly. When I uninstall the MSDN library (which is
about 1.8GB and comes on 3 CD's), it loads up very quickly.

But keep in mind, I had MSDN AND Visual Studio .NET 2003 installed BEFORE I
removed DX 8.1 SDK and DX 9.0 SDK, and it ran beautifully.

I'm wondering what more I could do to fix this issue? It drives me insane
having to wait forever for VS to load.

I have tried uninstalling MSDN, Visual Studio.NET and all Direct X SDK's,
and running a registry scan, rebooting, and reinstalling it all... It STILL
loads slowly.

Any suggestions are helpful! Thanks!



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How do I fix this DirectX install FUBAR?
    ... The 1.1 assemblies are included in the April 2006 SDK, ... According to the DirectX download site that is ... said that a newer version was already installed and no installation was ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.managed)
  • Re: How do I fix this DirectX install FUBAR?
    ... I don't think Zman was telling you not to use the April 2006 SDK - I thought he was telling you not to use the 2.0 assemblies, and to use the 1.1 assemblies instead, which AFAIK are included in the same SDK. ... DirectX newb like me to learn with I decided to be sure and get the latest release version. ... According to the DirectX download site that is the February 2006 version. ... It said that a newer version was already installed and no installation was needed and then finished out by doing nothing. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.managed)
  • Re: d3dx9d_25.dll - clarification
    ... is piggy-backed onto the REDIST for secure installation. ... D3DX DLL, you need to create a REDIST that contains DirectX 9.0c and the ... get the August DirectX SDK. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.graphics)
  • verifying SDK installation
    ... I just completed installation of DirectX December '05 SDK. ... I've installed the WMP 10 SDK, WMF 9.5 SDK, and the December DirectX. ... but it seems I'm missing something. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.sdk)
  • Re: Unanswered Question Asked By Many
    ... > Norton CleanSweep monitored the installation and I used CleanSweep to ... I read on Microsoft's support web site that DirectX 9.0b causes ... > network using scanner software physically running on a different machine. ... > initially selected "Administrator" for the administrator account name ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)