Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- From: Gerry Hickman <gerry666uk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:51:41 +0100
Hi,
Comments related to original post
1. I agree with Windows 2000 it was very neat with the client/server consistency. Same version of IIS and exact same DLLs for debugging. Unfortunately, this is not damaged forever by Microsoft's new mismatched o/s strategy.
2. Never put VS2005 on a Windows Server 2003; this is completely and utterly stupid and breaks every rule of client/server computing.
3. Client o/s Win2000/XP/Vista?
We still use Win2000 client for VS2005 as it's superior to XP in every way, but there will soon be things that will only work on XP or Vista so it's worth getting ready for the slow and bloated "home user" experience of a lifetime. We target Server 2003 with IIS6. I'm not aware of any security issues; our developers run with user rights, NOT admin rights. You should NEVER run with admin rights.
If your Server 2003 is a production server it should be set up by an expert from scratch as a custom build.
lf wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for your quick response. So, is it safe to assume that all the potential security issues that we could encounter are not insurmountable for a development environment?
"Kevin Spencer" wrote:
Windows Server 2003 will be a great deal more difficult to set up due to the increased security. However, if you're doing a web application, I agree that it would be better to develop on the Windows Server 2003 platform, as your app will have to deal with these security issues as well. As for IIS 6.0, it will be better for the app when deployed, but not much different at design time.
--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Professional Numbskull
Show me your certification without works,
and I'll show my certification
*by* my works.
"lf" <lf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4AE47428-95AC-4AF0-8ABB-DA2CBBD6823C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNot sure if this is the right group for this question, but it's kind a
hybrid, so here goes. Our production environment is moving to Windows 2003.
Presently, we have Windows 2000 server in production and all developers
desktops have Windows 2000 as well. This works well because we can on our
desktops using the same environment as production. Now, we are moving to
Windows 2003 on production and developers will be using Visual Studio 2005.
My question is this: What is the best OS for a developer. I have heard that
people have had issues with Windows 2003 server on the desktop, so this would
lead me to believe we should use XP Pro. However, I think XP Pro has IIS 5.0
and Windows 2003 has IIS 6.0. Ideally, it would be great if developers could
have the same level of IIS as production. What are other people using?
Since most of our applications are web applications it seems important to
have the same version of iis on our development machines. Thanks in advance
for your help.
--
Gerry Hickman (London UK)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- From: Kevin Spencer
- Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- References:
- Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- From: Kevin Spencer
- Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: New to .NET
- Next by Date: Re: Visual Studio2005 is a pain in the ...
- Previous by thread: Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Best desktop OS for VS 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading