Re: Compilation on VS 2005 Beta 2 is slower than on VS 2003

Don't see this as if they were doing this from the first day. It just means
that the "alpha" product (compiler, EDI or whatever) is written with a
previously available product and once they have something that "works
enough" they can move on and start building incrementaly the new product
using the previous built of this same product...

And it has been likely much easier for 2.0 than for the 1.0 release...

--
Patrice

"Hasan Kosten" <hkosten@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de
news:ea6u70t%23FHA.360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Borland is doing this with Delphi from the start. Every version of Delphi
> was developed with Delphi.
>
> "Nery Gonzalez" <nery_gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:usr9TPZ0FHA.2924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I have always wonder how you do this:
> >
> >> "we are using VS 2005 compiler to build VS 2005 itself."
> >
> > How can you compiled VS 2005 using a VS 2005?
> >
> > For me, it's like how can you have something built upon something that
you
> > are not supposed to have built it yet?
> >
> >
> >
> > "Mikhail Arkhipov (Microsoft)" <mikhaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió
en
> > el mensaje news:BF75CD0B.16EF7%mikhaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> On 10/14/05 15:01, in article uGJQbrQ0FHA.2880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> >> "Kevin
> >> Spencer" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think the term "beta" is the operative word here. The beta version
is
> >>> loaded with debugging symbols, among other things.
> >>
> >> We never ship Betas with debug code of symbols. Beta is normal release
> >> build, fully optimized. We do produce symbols internally, but they are
in
> >> separate PDB files and are not shipped to customers.
> >>
> >> As for slow performance, I would suggest filing a bug on MSDN Feedback
> >> site.
> >> I personally haven't noticed this and we are using VS 2005 compiler to
> >> build
> >> VS 2005 itself.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Mikhail Arkhipov (Microsoft)
> >> -- This post is provided 'AS IS' with no warranties and confers no
rights
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Compilation on VS 2005 Beta 2 is slower than on VS 2003
    ... it's like how can you have something built upon something that you ... > We never ship Betas with debug code of symbols. ... > As for slow performance, I would suggest filing a bug on MSDN Feedback ... > I personally haven't noticed this and we are using VS 2005 compiler to ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
  • Re: The trend is to move away from Delphi...
    ... Delphi built applications to run on Java. ... I don't believe they ever tried to get a "full blown delphi compiler" to ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Compilation on VS 2005 Beta 2 is slower than on VS 2003
    ... Borland is doing this with Delphi from the start. ... it's like how can you have something built upon something that you ... >> We never ship Betas with debug code of symbols. ... >> I personally haven't noticed this and we are using VS 2005 compiler to ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
  • Alternative Future of Delphi?
    ... relevant compiler or interpreter... ... No more intricate code generation required for a particular platform ... on the Delphi compiler side. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Which Delphi Version To Buy
    ... Given the fact that Delphi compiler is quick and small, do you see feasible having a runtime compiler/parser enabling what you describe above? ... For example the basic data types processing in Delphi is sensibly superior to .NET's one exactly because is closer to the iron. ... Well, for parallel programming I, for one, certainly feel the need of a VM simply because the actual CPU architecture is far from the way in which humans deal with the reality which is parallel. ... The vast majority of the games you have to deal with /different/ characters doing /different/ actions in parallel, responding each one to the stimuli which comes from the environment. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)