create .NET 1.1 code with VS2005?

Hi

I currently have a few projects that I can't just upgrade to .NET 2.0, but
I'd still like to make use of the new features as soon as possible. I
already have both runtimes running side by side peacefully and looking
around this group I also found that the same can be done for Visual Studio.
I don't really need my projects to stay compatible with VS2003, but I need
the compiled output to be compatible with .NET 1.1. One possibility is
compiling using csc.exe from the 1.1 runtime but I was wondering if there's
an option in VS2005 to create .NET 1.1 compatible code (of course provided
that I'm not making use of anything that's incompatible with .NET 1.1). In
java the compiler has the -source and -target flags that allow me to target
a certain JRE. Can the same be done in .NET? Or will binaries compiled
against .NET 2.0 run on .NET 1.1 provided I only make use of .NET 1.1
features?

Regards
Stephan


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Questions about the DLR
    ... References, declarations, etc. were all indexed, and there was even a macro that would refer to the source management database and show you the exact check-in and diff where the line was added or changed. ... I can see how the features you're talking about would be useful. ... Even the stuff that can be measured in seconds, I'm just not compiling often enough for it to be a big deal. ... obviously this is as much about .NET as it is about a specific IDE. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Moox firefox/thunderbird builds. Anyone looked at these yet?
    ... he's just compiling with specific support for certain processor features ... If you were being super paranoid, you could generate your own optimised ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: [g95] DECIMAL=comma do not work !?
    ... Michael Metcalf wrote: ... True, but DECIMAL='comma' in READ, WRITE and OPEN statements is one of ... the f2003 features that the g95 manual says is supported, ... is compiling with the g95 -std=f95 option, which correctly objects, ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Forth and Prolog
    ... Andreas Kochenburger wrote in message> For those who might like to play with it here is the link: ... I have tried this work and found that some forth's features are lack, ... CREATE, DOES>, switchability between interpreting and compiling. ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
  • Re: Installing ALSA ... (continued.) ["Against Techno-Fetishism !"]
    ... You have given me the encouragement and incentive I needed to upgrade ... I'll have to read up on static compiling but I'm glad to hear that ... Adam Bogacki, ... > statically and it just worked first time. ...
    (Debian-User)