Re: How popular is .net and the whole managed code scene?

From: Carlos J. Quintero [.NET MVP] (carlosq_at_NOSPAMsogecable.com)
Date: 03/01/05


Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:03:51 +0100

IMHO:

> such saying's :) while the rest were basically suggesting that it was
> nothing more a fad, a trend that would pass, and is in fact die'ing it's
> death as we spoke.

Not true, MS is commited with .NET. Its advantages are so many compared with
traditional languages and previous technologies (such as COM) that it is not
just a fad. But certainly we can not ignore that there is a huge base of
"legacy" code in companies (including MS) that can not be converted
overnight, so they will coexist for years and it will take time before we
see, say, Office written in .NET ;-)

> I not officially within the IT industry as yet, so I am looking for some
> input on this. Is .net and other forms of managed code, like say Java, and
> languages such as Python, wide spread within the industry and popular?

Java is popular for server applications. Not so successful for client apps
with UI, at least for Windows.
.NET is being used for new developments in many companies, but there is many
people waiting for VS 2005 to bring from VB6.

> or is the industry skeptical of such code and sticking with it's
> traditional C/C++ roots?

It depends on the product that you build and other factors.

> So what is everyone opinion of managed and such languages as C# or Python
> and so on, is it really worth investing time in learning such tools?
> or should one simply stick to the more traditional languages??

I would say yes. At the very least, the more languages you know, the more
value you can offer to your employers. But if you build software for your
own, just pick the language that has more sense for the task.

-- 
Carlos J. Quintero
MZ-Tools 4.0: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio .NET
You can code, design and document much faster.
http://www.mztools.com


Relevant Pages

  • Generic Programming - What Is the Best Method? (Was: Intelligent macros .vs. BITS)
    ... But *NOT* just because that's the current fad that we should ... However, even among strong supporters of generic programming, there is ... What languages do it badly and what are the shortcomings of those approaches? ... I'm looking not only for ease and robustness of implementation, but also robustness and ease of use in using the generic programming feature for developing applications in Fortran. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • ADA Popularity Discussion Request
    ... ADA is not as popular as to it is ... Perl (well I use it at work, for legacy reasons of taking over ... least one of those languages. ... why is ADA not as popular as the above languages to the ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • googling for fun (and profit...? naah!-)
    ... python ruby perl caml java haskell lisp eiffel sml scheme ... with the programming languages as I thought of them. ... programming isn't as popular a term as I'd have thought (but still, ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: part 21 asserts forth best for small memory systems, would lisp be better in non small mem?
    ... it indicates weaknesses in Forth. ... The most popular languages could owe much of their popularity ... If you could find a way to make Forth 100 times as popular as it is now, ... and does lead large successful Forth projects using rigid standards and ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
  • Re: Languages which turned corners
    ... The impressions I have had in the last few years is that Fortran is on ... Fortran for sure is useful in its niche, ... languages with lower popularity, and not much ups and downs. ... it's definitely a sign that a sufficiently popular niche can ...
    (comp.lang.forth)