Re: Application Logging Block

From: DougBurke (douglas_burke_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/05/04 

Date: 4 Aug 2004 23:42:44 -0700

Here is a lead for the original question about stack trace missing:

http://groups.google.com.au/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=JSvE4BQ5DHA.2920%40cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl&rnum=4&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Ddoug%2Bburke%2Bgroup:microsoft.public.vsnet.enterprise.tools%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dmicrosoft.public.vsnet.enterprise.tools%26selm%3DJSvE4BQ5DHA.2920%2540cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl%26rnum%3D4

That's a long url... do a search for "stack trace missing" in this
news group (in other words the google group search is: "stack trace
missing group:microsoft.public.vsnet.enterprise.tools"

Doug

mikehayt_@online.microsoft.com (Mike Hayton [MS]) wrote in message news:<bPlXgRkeEHA.3856@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>...
> I dont know the answer to the question below. But I do know that there was
> a separate thread about logging block questions where the team that
> produced the logging block (a different one from EIF) said:
>
> For any feedback to this please send to devfdbck@microsoft.com. We
> (patterns & practices [1] )developed these extensions to EIF and would like
> to here any feedback or help in anyways we can.
>
> The title of the thread was "Please read for info on Logging Application
> Block (Extensions to EIF)" from Scott Densmore (scottden@microsoft.com).
>
> A different thread says:
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> From: "Tom Hollander [MSFT]" <tomholl@online.microsoft.com>
> Subject: Re: Where to make Inquiries?
> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:42:11 -0800
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.vsnet.enterprise.tools
>
> Actually the preferred workspace for the Logging Application Block is:
> http://workspaces.gotdotnet.com/excep
> Note that this workspace is also used for discussion about the Exception
> Management Application Block, given the close relationship between the two
> blocks.
>
> This workspace is monitored by Microsoft PAG, and also by other users of the
> blocks who are often able to provide answers to questions.
>
> Regards,
> Tom Hollander
> Microsoft PAG
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I suggest that you email them directly and tell them your opinion/question.
> Perhaps you could post their reply?
> Maybe you might like to suggest that they check this newsgroup and reply to
> the logging block questions directly?
> Possibly there's someone else out there in the community who knows the
> answer to this?
>
> Sorry I couldnt be of more help
>
> Mike
>
> --------------------
> | Any Help ?
> | --
> | Application Architect
> |
> |
> | "Ravinder Jain" wrote:
> |
> | > When I use logSink provided by application logging block, my events get
> published but doesn't have all the information. For example stacktrace,
> ProcessId, ProcessName etc..are empty
> | >
> | > But when I use eifLogSink, I can see these values. The eifLogsink is
> using the original sink provided by EIF.
> | >
> | > Am I doing something wrong? Any lead?
> | >
> | > --
> | > Application Architect
> | > Ravinder Jain
> |

Loading