Re: OS on a logical drive by itself?
- From: poutnik <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:57:28 +0200
In article <kolg4696uvlfls6imnv5s8vfftut2q40jk@xxxxxxx>,
kblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
Although some people have that point of view, I don't agree at all.
You might like to read my views on partitioning in this article I've
written: "Understanding Disk Partitioning" at
http://www.computorcompanion.com/LPMArticle.asp?ID=326
[Quoting of link content]
1. If your backup scheme is to image the entire drive, have just a
single partition (usually C:).
2. If you just backup data, set up two partitions: one for Windows and
installed application programs (usually C:), and the other for data
(usually D:).
In my opinion, except for those running multiple operating systems, you
seldom get any benefit to having more than two partitions.
[/Quoting]
There is another backup scheme where 2 partitions is advantage:
Imaging whole system/application partition C
and backuping just part of data partition D.
.
- References:
- OS on a logical drive by itself?
- From: PeoplesChoice
- Re: OS on a logical drive by itself?
- From: Ken Blake, MVP
- OS on a logical drive by itself?
- Prev by Date: Re: OS on a logical drive by itself?
- Next by Date: Re: OS on a logical drive by itself?
- Previous by thread: Re: OS on a logical drive by itself?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|