Re: Windows Experience Index of 4.1
- From: "Ian D" <taurus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:07:40 -0400
"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:16:40 +0530, mspohLFC
I have recently added an extra 1gb of RAM to make my total RAM up to
3gb. However, the Windows Experience Index score for RAM stayed at 4.1.
Is there any reason for this or is it just Vista being stupid again?
The index rates the RAM's speed, not its quantity.
My view is that what the index mostly does is confuse people, and it
would have been better if it weren't there at all.
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Not only that, it seems to underrate high performance dual
core Xeon CPUs. I guess the Xeon's capabilities don't match
up with the algorithm Vista uses to measure CPU performance.
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Experience Index of 4.1
- Next by Date: Re: Event Viewer System Log Error 13
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Experience Index of 4.1
- Next by thread: Bsod irql_not_less_or_equal