Re: K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- From: "zachd [MSFT]" <zachd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:13:43 -0800
That's a trick question. Codec packs (especially K-Lite) have done an immense amount of damage to users, even if you're ignoring them stealing people's work.
CCCP would be a better *and* more ethical choice.
--
Speaking for myself only.
See http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html for some helpful WMP info.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--
"JerzyMarian" <jerzymarian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4C67EA65-7F43-4698-825F-7389D82246E4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello. Which one is better to use with VISTA Ultimatex86? Greetings
--
JerzyMarian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- From: JerzyMarian
- Re: K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- References:
- K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- From: JerzyMarian
- K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- Prev by Date: Re: WMP no video
- Next by Date: Re: WMP no video
- Previous by thread: K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- Next by thread: Re: K-Lite or Vista Codecs Package
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|