Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- From: "Curious" <<spammenot@xxxxxxxxxx>>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:15:21 -0700
AFAIK 32bit programs run in Vista 64 just as fast as they do in 32 bit. However, Since Vista 64 itself is a 64 bit program all OS functions run faster. You can also fully support 4GB or more memory with Vista 64.
"Mark Conrad" <noneof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:noneof-3F1462.08265415082008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <2F0F8D1E-2DCA-404A-AE29-9FF5044367AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Phillips" <afn18721@xxxxxxx> wrote:
If you have the money, you can build a nice (lots of RAM) Vista 64-bit PC
and then run virtual machines w/ a 32-bit OS.
Otherwise, not yet... and probably it will take a couple of years till
64-bit CPUs will become mainstream so that there will be some incentives for
software companies to produce competitive 64-bit applications.
Michael
Thanks, that is what I wanted to find out.
Guess like most others I will wait, except for
possibly a little "dabbling" to see how difficult
it is to install/run a 64 bit OS.
Appears to be a catch-22 situation, users not
switching, therefore no incentive to create software.
Mark-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- References:
- Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- From: Phillips
- Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- Prev by Date: Premium to Ultimate Upgrade problem
- Next by Date: Re: Premium to Ultimate Upgrade problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- Next by thread: Re: Enough 3rd-party apps to make 64bit Vista worthwhile?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|